Low confidence · Latest 61 of 99 total reviews analyzed · Based on 99 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Frustrated
Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate long-term reliability of core tracking features keeps users engaged for over a decade, but report catastrophic data loss following recent updates prevents users from accessing historical health records.
Rating: 4.2
Reviews: 99
Confidence: low
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.4/ 5
★★★★★★
(363.1K)Current version
4.0/ 5
-0.5 vs overall
★★★★★
(3.8K)Main signal post-update: catastrophic data loss following recent updates prevents users from accessing historical health records.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Rating over time
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Releases:MajorMinorPatch2 releases in range
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Long-term reliability of core tracking features keeps users engaged for over a decade
- “Users report consistent usage patterns spanning ten years or more”
- “The simple design and accurate cycle prediction remain primary drivers for long-term retention”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Catastrophic data loss following recent updates prevents users from accessing historical health records
- “Multiple reports of years of logged health data disappearing after applying updates”
- “Users state that built-in restore functions fail to recover historical information”
Request
Most requested
- Reliable data backup and recovery mechanisms to prevent permanent loss of health history
- “Users request a functional way to export or securely back up their cycle data”
- “Demand for a working restore button that actually retrieves historical logs”