High confidence · Latest 120 of 414 total reviews analyzed

Mixed

Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate extensive library of royalty-free assets provides significant value for content creators and students and absence of intrusive advertisements improves the overall user experience during asset discovery, but report copyright claims on supposedly free music assets create significant legal risk for creators and navigation regressions prevent users from returning to search results after viewing individual assets.

Rating: 4.6

Reviews: 414

Confidence: high

How did the latest release land?

Overall
4.4/ 5
(31.1K)
Current version
4.8/ 5
+0.4 vs overall
(1.6K)
Main signal post-update: extensive library of royalty-free assets provides significant value for content creators and students.

Sentiment over time

Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.

Review themes

Praise

What users love

  • Extensive library of royalty-free assets provides significant value for content creators and students
    • Users frequently mention the massive collection of images and videos as a primary benefit
    • Creators highlight the utility of free assets for school projects and digital content
  • Absence of intrusive advertisements improves the overall user experience during asset discovery
    • Reviewers appreciate the clean interface free from disruptive ad placements
    • The lack of ads is cited as a key differentiator compared to other stock platforms
  • High quality of visual resources supports professional and amateur creative projects
    • Users praise the clarity and color quality of the available photographs
    • The platform is described as a reliable source for high-definition wallpapers and reference material
Complaint

Common complaints

  • Copyright claims on supposedly free music assets create significant legal risk for creators
    • Multiple users report receiving copyright strikes on social media after using platform music
    • The discrepancy between the free-to-use claim and actual copyright enforcement is a major pain point
  • Navigation regressions prevent users from returning to search results after viewing individual assets
    • Users express frustration at having to restart searches after opening a single image
    • The lack of a back button or intuitive navigation flow is a recurring usability complaint
  • Technical failures during asset downloads prevent users from accessing content on mobile devices
    • Reports of download buttons freezing or returning errors are common post-update
    • Users note that some downloaded video files appear as zero-length in device galleries
Request

Most requested

  • Persistent login sessions to avoid repeated authentication requirements during daily use
    • Users request that the app remember credentials to avoid frequent re-login cycles
    • The current authentication flow is described as onerous and disruptive to the workflow

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Pixabay, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0