Planeskeeper vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Planeskeeper's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Planeskeeper
This App
TopDecked MTG
Contender
ManaBox MTG
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperJeffery Galen ReedARCANE TINMEN APSTopDecked LimitedSkillDevs S.C.Michael Bourkas
CategoryUtilitiesGamesUtilitiesProductivityGames
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 5
Ratings Count03,6832,7091,5342,052
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateApr 15, 2026Apr 22, 2020Mar 3, 2017May 11, 2019Apr 25, 2020
Last UpdatedApr 26, 2026Apr 2, 2026Nov 13, 2025Apr 14, 2026Apr 22, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--mixedmixedexcellent
Score--65/10065/10095/100
Praises--
  • Cross-platform synchronization between mobile and desktop web interfaces enables seamless deck management
  • Comprehensive collection tracking and deck building tools provide significant value for dedicated players
  • Clean and ad-free interface
Complaints--
  • Manual card entry requirements create significant friction for users managing large physical collections
  • Inconsistent card scanning performance makes cataloging large collections a frustrating and time-consuming manual process
  • Lack of advanced analytics
Requests--
  • Automated card scanning functionality is requested to eliminate manual data entry for large collections
  • Desktop or web-based interface requested to facilitate easier management of large card collections
  • Gesture-based input
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • AI-driven deck optimization reduces user friction
  • CRISPI power ratings establish authority in game balance
  • Multi-format export supports interoperability
-
  • Cross-platform sync creates high switching costs for users managing decks across mobile and web
  • Tournament management tools facilitate organic user acquisition via local event hosting
  • Offline database utility creates high switching costs for power users
  • Multi-language support expands addressable market beyond English-speaking regions
  • High-frequency update cycle sustains user trust
  • Broad format support captures niche Commander players
  • Ad-free model drives organic install velocity
Weaknesses
  • Zero monetization strategy limits development velocity
  • No cloud-save functionality creates data-loss risk
  • Lack of established brand authority compared to incumbents
-
  • Manual entry requirement for collections creates a high-friction barrier for power users
  • Subscription pricing is perceived as high relative to market alternatives
  • Scanner reliability issues on dark-art cards persist post-update
  • Subscription paywalls for basic deck storage alienate casual users
  • Lack of gesture-based input slows down play
  • Missing post-game performance charts
  • No integrated marketplace pricing data
Pricingfreefreemiumfreemiumsubscriptionfree
MomentumIntenseIntenseMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence5 versions5 versions2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~2d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~19d avg

Compare Planeskeeper head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Planeskeeper, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0