Planning-Poker vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Planning-Poker's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Planify
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperMobile Software AGSanjay ShahChameleon Software Pty LtdBeghou ConsultingGeoSafe Inc.Angel SosaSNEH NILESH
CategoryProductivityProductivityBusinessBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivity
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 52.3 / 51.0 / 55.0 / 54.5 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count03111200
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99
Release DateMar 15, 2024Dec 29, 2025Sep 2, 2016Aug 26, 2019Dec 3, 2013Nov 20, 2025Jan 29, 2025
Last UpdatedNov 27, 2025Dec 29, 2025Aug 19, 2024Feb 19, 2026Apr 28, 2026Dec 21, 2025Jan 27, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-------
Score-------
Praises-------
Complaints-------
Requests-------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Agile-focused card set provides immediate utility for Scrum practitioners
  • Zero-cost model removes friction for team-wide adoption
  • Automated registration scanning reduces manual entry errors for field users
  • Collision reporting assistant provides immediate value during high-stress events
  • Secure four-digit PIN authentication provides a low-friction security gate for sensitive client data.
  • Configurable modules for therapeutic markets enable high switching costs
  • HIPAA-compliant architecture secures enterprise-level B2B partnerships
  • Focused field-first UX maintains high user satisfaction in high-stress environments
  • CAD interoperability functions as a B2B distribution barrier into public safety agencies
  • Unified project-to-billing workflow reduces administrative overhead for small contractors
  • Minimalist interface design reduces visual stimulation
  • Paid-upfront model avoids recurring subscription friction
  • Focus on digital wellbeing creates a clear, singular value proposition
Weaknesses
  • Total lack of monetization limits long-term product investment
  • No cloud-save functionality creates data-loss risk for distributed teams
  • 2.33-star rating on iOS indicates poor UX stability
  • Lack of ERP synchronization limits utility compared to enterprise competitors
  • Premium tier is gated by desktop software licensing, creating a high barrier to entry for new mobile users.
  • Manual data entry workflows create friction for field users
  • Lack of mobile-first automated capture limits daily active usage
  • No cloud-save functionality despite field-critical data usage
  • 0.7★ rating gap between Android and iOS platforms
  • 0-rating baseline across platforms signals zero social proof
  • $0.99 price point creates a barrier to entry
  • No context-aware automation
  • Lacks deep system-level integration found in pro-level launchers
Pricingfreefreesubscriptionpaidfreefreepaid
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~52d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~348d avg2 versions, ~164d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg2 versions, ~54d avg1 versions

Compare Planning-Poker head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Planning-Poker, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0