Low confidence · Latest 60 of 79 total reviews analyzed · Based on 79 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Mixed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate open source nature and lack of restrictive licensing fees appeal to professional gis users, but report frequent application crashes and stability regressions disrupt critical data collection workflows in the field.
Rating: 4.4
Reviews: 79
Confidence: low
How did the latest release land?
Overall
4.4/ 5
★★★★★★
(7.6K)Current version
4.2/ 5
-0.2 vs overall
★★★★★
(30)Main signal post-update: frequent application crashes and stability regressions disrupt critical data collection workflows in the field.
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
Review themes
Praise
What users love
- Open source nature and lack of restrictive licensing fees appeal to professional GIS users
- “Users highlight the absence of special licensing costs compared to competing field mapping tools”
- “The open source model is frequently cited as a primary reason for adoption”
Complaint
Common complaints
- Frequent application crashes and stability regressions disrupt critical data collection workflows in the field
- “Users report consistent crashes after short periods of map interaction”
- “Recent updates are associated with increased instability and failure to launch”
Request
Most requested
- Integration of standard payment methods like store billing for cloud service subscriptions
- “Users without credit cards request alternative payment options for cloud plan upgrades”