QField for QGIS user reviews, decoded

Low confidence · Latest 60 of 79 total reviews analyzed · Based on 79 reviews. Signal may be noisy.

Mixed

Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate open source nature and lack of restrictive licensing fees appeal to professional gis users, but report frequent application crashes and stability regressions disrupt critical data collection workflows in the field.

Rating: 4.4

Reviews: 79

Confidence: low

How did the latest release land?

Overall
4.4/ 5
(7.6K)
Current version
4.2/ 5
-0.2 vs overall
(30)
Main signal post-update: frequent application crashes and stability regressions disrupt critical data collection workflows in the field.

Sentiment over time

Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.

Not enough recent reviews to plot a sentiment trend.

How have ratings & review volume moved?

Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.

Review sentiment over time

Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.

Review themes

Praise

What users love

  • Open source nature and lack of restrictive licensing fees appeal to professional GIS users
Complaint

Common complaints

  • Frequent application crashes and stability regressions disrupt critical data collection workflows in the field
Request

Most requested

Full sentiment breakdown

Access the full report for free

AI summary. Key signals synthesized from the latest 79 reviews. Updated regularly.

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with automated quality gates, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by QField for QGIS, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0