Report updated Jun 25, 2026
Remote Control for Roku
For roku TV owners seeking a mobile-based remote alternative with integrated web casting capabilities.
Remote Control for Roku is an established utilities app that is free with in-app purchases. With a 4.7/5 rating from 53.3K reviews, it shows polarized user reception. Users particularly appreciate reliable remote functionality provides a functional replacement for broken physical hardware, though persistent connection drops require frequent device restarts to maintain remote control remains a common concern.
What is Remote Control for Roku?
Remote Control for Roku is a mobile utility app that provides a virtual remote interface and web-casting capabilities for Roku TV devices on iOS and Android.
Users hire this app as an immediate, low-friction replacement for lost or broken physical Roku remotes to regain control over their media playback.
Current Momentum
v11.4 · 3w ago
Intense- Ships connection stability improvements.
- Maintains consistent Roku-only feature focus.
Active Nemesis
TV Remote - Universal Control
By EVOLLY.APP
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
UtilitiesNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
Recent User Mood
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
What Are The Key Features?
Streams web videos, movies, and IPTV content from mobile browser to Roku TV in 4K HD
Provides direct access to remote control functions from the Android home screen
Provides virtual navigation and text input interface for Roku TV
Automatically saves the previous remote connection for quick access on relaunch
How much does it cost?
- Free version with ad support
- Premium tier via in-app purchases
Ad-supported model monetizes high-volume utility usage, with premium in-app purchases likely gating advanced features or removing ads.
Who Built It?
Oz Shabbatth
Providing smartphone-based remote control solutions for smart TVs and streaming devices to replace physical hardware with intuitive software.
Portfolio
11
Apps
What other apps does Oz Shabbatth make?
Remote control for LG
Viz - Smart TV remote control
Remote for Fire devices
Remote control for Sony
Remote control for TCL
Phil - Smart TV Remote Control
Explore the full Oz Shabbatth report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Oz Shabbatth.
What do users think recently?
High confidence · 49 reviews analyzed
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate reliable remote functionality provides a functional replacement for broken physical hardware and accessible free tier allows users to control devices without mandatory subscription costs, but report persistent connection drops require frequent device restarts to maintain remote control and missing volume and power controls limit the utility of the remote interface.
Limited review volume (49 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for Remote Control for Roku?
How's The Utilities Market?
**Pricing Strategy**: Freemium model with ad-supported core utility and premium in-app purchases for advanced features. **Target Audience**: Roku TV owners seeking a mobile-based remote alternative with integrated web casting capabilities. **Messaging Themes**: Simplicity, casting, remote control, home entertainment.
How does it evolve in the Utilities market?
Remote Control for Roku holds a stable position in the Tools category, with a 4.71 rating on Android. The gap between its Roku-specific focus and the universal-remote market leaders signals a need to prioritize hardware-control parity to defend its user base.
Rank progression
49 active rankings tracked — 30-day window
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
This app dominates the Roku remote niche with a massive user base and consistent, long-term market presence.
Differentiators
- Offers a universal remote solution covering multiple TV brands beyond just Roku devices.
- Maintains a massive, established user base that creates a significant barrier to entry.
- Provides a highly refined, multi-year feature set that standardizes the remote experience.
Head to head
The target app must double down on its 'Roku-first' simplicity to differentiate from the bloated, universal-focused approach of this market leader.
Same space(1)
A direct Roku-specific competitor that maintains high release velocity to capture market share.
Differentiators
- Maintains a high release cadence with six updates in the last six months alone.
- Targets the same specific Roku-only audience, creating direct feature-for-feature competition.
New entrants(2)
Represents an adjacent utility threat by focusing on voice-controlled media management.
Differentiators
- Prioritizes voice-first interaction models over the traditional touch-pad remote interface.
- Targets the audio-visual control niche by focusing on high-fidelity media device integration.
An emerging threat that integrates remote control into a broader smart home ecosystem.
Differentiators
- Bundles remote functionality within a comprehensive smart home automation and device management suite.
- Leverages high-frequency updates to maintain compatibility with an expanding range of IoT hardware.
Compare Remote Control for Roku against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for Remote Control for Roku
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Zero-setup connection flow reduces time-to-first-action
- Roku-specific interface avoids universal-remote bloat
- Web-casting capability expands ad-inventory beyond basic navigation
Critical Frictions
- Missing power and volume controls force reliance on physical remotes
- Frequent connection drops trigger negative review cycles
- Aggressive ad frequency disrupts core navigation tasks
Growth Levers
- Integration of volume and power controls to capture physical-remote users
- B2B partnerships with Roku-integrated TV manufacturers
Market Threats
- Universal remote apps siphoning multi-device households
- Smart-home platforms bundling remote features into broader IoT suites
- Connection stability issues driving users to higher-rated competitors
What are the next best moves?
Ship volume and power control buttons because they are the top-requested missing features → reduce churn to physical remotes
Multiple reviews highlight the absence of dedicated volume and power buttons as the primary reason users cannot fully replace their physical remotes.
Trade-off: Push the web-casting UI refresh to Q3 — casting is a differentiator, but basic remote parity is a retention requirement.
Audit connection logic because persistent drops are the #1 complaint theme → improve daily active habit
Users report needing to restart the app or television hardware to restore connectivity, which erodes the daily active habit.
Trade-off: Pause the home-screen widget update — connection stability has 3x the impact on churn.
A counter-intuitive read
The app's Roku-only focus is its primary vulnerability, as multi-device households will inevitably migrate to universal-remote apps that consolidate their entire living room hardware into one interface.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Universal TV brand support (available in TV Remote - Universal Control but absent here)
- Dedicated volume and power hardware controls (available in physical remotes and universal-remote apps)
Key Takeaways
The app maintains a stable user base through its simple, Roku-specific interface, but the lack of power and volume controls prevents it from fully replacing physical hardware, so the PM should prioritize hardware-control parity to reduce churn to universal-remote rivals.
Where Is It Heading?
Mixed Signals
The casual-utility market is consolidating around universal-remote solutions that offer broader hardware compatibility, leaving Roku-only apps like this one increasingly exposed. Unless the app achieves full hardware-control parity, it will continue to serve only as a secondary backup rather than a primary remote, limiting its long-term retention potential.
Persistent connection drops require frequent hardware restarts, which erodes the daily active habit and compounds the rating drag on Android.
Recent updates focused on connection stability, but the lack of core hardware controls leaves the app exposed to feature-rich universal competitors.