High confidence · Latest 60 of 121 total reviews analyzed · Based on 121 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate the core identification feature provides quick results for users who capture clear, high-quality photographs, but report inaccurate identification results across multiple attempts on the same specimen frustrate users seeking reliable data and aggressive paywall mechanics and subscription traps prevent users from testing the core functionality effectively.
Rating: 4.3
Reviews: 121
Confidence: high
How did the latest release land?
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Review themes
What users love
- The core identification feature provides quick results for users who capture clear, high-quality photographs
- “Users report successful identification when lighting and image clarity are optimal”
- “Some players find the app informative and quick to use for rock classification”
Common complaints
- Inaccurate identification results across multiple attempts on the same specimen frustrate users seeking reliable data
- “Multiple users report receiving different, incorrect identifications for the same rock in consecutive tests”
- “The identification engine fails to recognize common stones like diamonds or tiger eye”
- Aggressive paywall mechanics and subscription traps prevent users from testing the core functionality effectively
- “Users report being charged for annual subscriptions immediately after starting a trial”
- “The app blocks camera access with persistent premium upgrade prompts during the identification process”