MARLVEL

Scoop - Carpooling & Commuting vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Scoop - Carpooling & Commuting's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Scoop - Carpooling & Commuting
This App
Sentient Jet
Peer
Perk
Peer
eCherha
Peer
Commute with Enterprise
Peer
NetJets
Peer
Groundlink Partner
New Kid
We Move Ita
New Kid
Crewlu
New Kid
Shuttlers Squad
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperScoop Commute, Inc.Sentient JetPerk Platform SLMinistry for development of UkraineEAN Services, LLCNetJets Inc.Naeem GillFasano BeppeTodd AndersonShuttlers Mobility
CategoryTravelTravelBusinessAuto & VehiclesTravelTravelTravelTravel & LocalTravelTravel
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.3 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count19,6748731,1742,6029503810180
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 10, 2015Jun 28, 2016Mar 10, 2020Mar 22, 2023Nov 13, 2018Aug 16, 2015Feb 23, 2026May 6, 2026Dec 3, 2025Dec 18, 2024
Last UpdatedApr 29, 2026May 13, 2026May 9, 2026May 13, 2026Apr 16, 2026Mar 24, 2026Feb 23, 2026May 22, 2026May 6, 2026Apr 1, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterrible---negativenegative----
Score20/100---35/10035/100----
Praises
  • Carpooling service provides a cost-effective alternative to standard ride-sharing platforms for daily commuters
---
  • Commute management functionality provides a convenient way for vanpool members to handle payments
  • Flight coordination features allow teams to manage business travel logistics effectively
----
Complaints
  • Unresponsive interface buttons prevent users from scheduling rides or viewing carpool details effectively
---
  • Persistent login loops and authentication failures prevent users from accessing core account features
  • Limited app functionality forces users to rely on the web browser for essential tasks
  • Registration process failures prevent new users from creating accounts successfully
  • Fixed popover menu layouts hide essential action buttons on smaller screens
----
Requests
  • Implementation of a driver and rider rating system to improve accountability and service reliability
---
  • Biometric authentication integration would improve security and reduce the burden of frequent manual logins
-----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Carpool lane access provides a time-saving utility that reinforces daily habit formation.
  • Proprietary safety audit data functions as a B2B distribution barrier into high-net-worth partnerships
  • 24/7 live chat creates a high-touch service moat against automated mass-market travel apps
  • Automated expense processing reduces manual finance workload
  • Policy-powered cards enforce compliance at point of sale
-
  • Corporate partnership network provides a stable B2B distribution moat
  • Vehicle maintenance coverage removes individual ownership friction
  • Contract-usage tracking provides a high-touch ownership experience
  • Direct management of in-flight preferences reduces concierge overhead
  • 24/7 corporate care provides a reliability buffer for executive clients.
  • Cashless self-billing mechanism reduces administrative overhead for independent fleet operators.
  • Certified driver network functions as a trust-based barrier to entry against gig-economy platforms
  • Transparent rate display reduces booking friction for high-intent business travelers
  • Automated ingestion of flight-specific logistics functions as a high-switching-cost mechanism for professional pilots.
-
Weaknesses
  • Unresponsive interface buttons in the latest version create high-friction experiences for booking daily rides.
  • 0.9★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • No ground-logistics integration for arrival/departure coordination
  • 0.11 rating gap between Android and iOS
  • No offline mode for itineraries
-
  • Persistent authentication loops in the latest release
  • Lack of native feature parity forces web-browser redirection
  • Registration failures block new user acquisition
  • Fixed UI layouts hide primary action buttons
  • App crashes on older hardware configurations
  • Manual ride acceptance interface lacks the efficiency of algorithmic dispatch models.
  • No integrated expense management or travel analytics for enterprise-level reporting.
  • Zero user reviews across both platforms limit social proof
  • No website integration reduces brand legitimacy for new users
  • Five-import free tier limit creates a conversion friction point for casual users.
-
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreefreefreefreefreemiumfree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenance-
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~2d avg5 versions2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~4d avg1 versions3 versions, ~16d avg2 versions, ~3d avg-

Compare Scoop - Carpooling & Commuting head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Scoop - Carpooling & Commuting, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0