Seek by iNaturalist user reviews, decoded
High confidence · 100 reviews analyzed · Based on 100 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
The recent review mood reads frustrated. Users appreciate educational value and species identification features provide a rewarding experience for nature enthusiasts and students and free access to nature identification tools without intrusive advertisements creates a positive user experience, but report inaccurate identification results post-update frequently misclassify common plants and animals as unrelated species.
Rating: 3.3
Reviews: 100
Confidence: high
The latest update failed to address the widespread reports of inaccurate identification, with users continuing to flag the AI model as less reliable than previous versions.
How did the latest release land?
Sentiment over time
Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.
How have ratings & review volume moved?
Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.
Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.
Review themes
What users love
- Educational value and species identification features provide a rewarding experience for nature enthusiasts and students
- Free access to nature identification tools without intrusive advertisements creates a positive user experience
Common complaints
- Inaccurate identification results post-update frequently misclassify common plants and animals as unrelated species
Most requested
Full sentiment breakdown
Access the full report for freeAI summary. Key signals synthesized from the latest 100 reviews. Updated regularly.