MARLVEL

Slow-Fast Motion Video Editor vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Slow-Fast Motion Video Editor's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Slow-Fast Motion Video Editor
This App
BoomLoop Loop Video Maker
Nemesis
Reverse Video - Play Backwards
Contender
Video Merger: Join videos
Contender
Portrait Video - Blurry Effect
Contender
Voice Over Video: Dub Videos
Contender
TechSmith Capture
Peer
AI Product Video - VideoMagic
Peer
MOTIV Video
Peer
Screen Recorder
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperAlan CushwayArthur Eduardo Skaetta Alvarez Desenvolvimento de Software LTDA.Arthur Eduardo Skaetta Alvarez Desenvolvimento de Software LTDA.Arthur Eduardo Skaetta Alvarez Desenvolvimento de Software LTDA.Arthur Eduardo Skaetta Alvarez Desenvolvimento de Software LTDA.Arthur Eduardo Skaetta Alvarez Desenvolvimento de Software LTDA.TechSmith CorporationBIVEXShureApp of the Year
CategoryPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoPhoto & VideoGraphics & DesignPhoto & VideoPhoto & Video
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.3 / 54.5 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 54.3 / 54.6 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count9,72453720826128950210,1081402,46029,640
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 2, 2015Nov 21, 2022Dec 6, 2020Aug 28, 2020Jun 24, 2021Jan 9, 2021Sep 21, 2017Oct 16, 2025Jan 25, 2018Sep 18, 2019
Last UpdatedJan 19, 2026May 4, 2026May 4, 2026May 4, 2026May 4, 2026May 4, 2026Nov 10, 2021Apr 9, 2026May 21, 2026May 5, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentexcellent-----positiveterriblepositiveterrible
Score85/100-----85/10015/10085/10025/100
Praises
  • Simple and efficient interface allows users to adjust video speed without complex editing workflows
-----
  • Reliable screen capture functionality
-
  • Professional audio fidelity
  • Simple screen recording functionality provides value for casual content creation needs
Complaints
  • Occasional technical instability and glitches prevent the application from processing video files correctly
-----
  • Lack of mobile-native editing tools
  • Aggressive monetization strategy forces users to purchase credits even after paying for a full subscription
  • Limited camera switching
  • Aggressive paywalls prevent exporting or saving videos longer than a few seconds
  • Technical instability causes random recording pauses and failure to save long sessions
Requests
  • Expanded playback speed options beyond the current maximum limit for more creative control
-----
  • Mobile-native editing features
  • Transparent pricing models that do not require secondary credit purchases for active subscribers
  • Advanced editing tools
  • Expanded free recording limits to allow for longer gameplay sessions without subscription
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Watermark-free export functions as a primary acquisition moat against subscription-gated competitors
  • Audio pitch correction provides high-fidelity output that reduces churn to basic editors
  • Simple interface sustains high organic install velocity via word-of-mouth
-----
  • Direct workflow integration into Camtasia sustains professional user retention
  • Established brand trust in the corporate documentation space
  • Business Workspace centralized dashboard increases switching costs
  • Flexible credit system captures seasonal revenue segments
  • Multi-platform export automates aspect ratio syndication
  • Shure brand reputation for professional audio fidelity
  • Hardware-integrated DSP controls for Shure microphones
  • High-resolution metering for real-time signal tracking
  • Floating toolbox simplifies recording workflow
  • Internal audio capture addresses core gamer pain points
  • Multi-camera recording differentiates from basic system tools
Weaknesses
  • Technical instability in processing video files creates churn risk
  • Forced rating prompts during onboarding generate negative sentiment
  • Lack of generative AI features limits appeal to power users
-----
  • Premium tier absent for mobile-native editing
  • Reliance on WiFi for file transfers creates workflow friction
  • No mobile-native editing tools
  • Dual-layer monetization triggers high-frequency churn
  • Processing failures and data loss erode professional trust
  • AI image distortion renders tool ineffective for detail-oriented segments
  • Lack of multi-camera switching during recording
  • Basic editing suite compared to video-first rivals
  • No cloud-sync for project files
  • 0.49★ rating gap between iOS and Android
  • Paywall blocks basic save-to-camera-roll functionality
  • High-frequency reports of recording session failures
Pricingfreemiumfreefreefreefreefreefreefreemiumfreesubscription
Momentum------ZombieIntenseMaintenanceIntense
Update Cadence------1 versions5 versions1 versions5 versions

Compare Slow-Fast Motion Video Editor head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Slow-Fast Motion Video Editor, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0