Sololearn: Learn to Code vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Sololearn: Learn to Code's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Codecademy Go
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperSololearn IncMimo GmbHCodecademy, LLCENKI LABS Inc.Rightsol Private LimitedKhan AcademyCourseraUdemyAppleTynker
CategoryEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducationEducation
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 53.7 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count80,687107,03937,7321,0519,790105,047168,83876,6571,84618,152
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateOct 23, 2017Aug 22, 2016Aug 2, 2018Jul 9, 2015Nov 13, 2015Mar 11, 2012Dec 10, 2013Oct 16, 2012Sep 13, 2016Mar 5, 2014
Last UpdatedApr 25, 2026May 4, 2026Feb 6, 2026Apr 27, 2026Mar 11, 2026Feb 24, 2026May 4, 2026Apr 7, 2026Mar 17, 2026Apr 8, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixednegative---positivenegativeterrible--
Score45/10035/100---78/10025/10014/100--
Praises
  • Beginner-friendly coding lessons provide an accessible entry point for learning multiple programming languages
  • Interactive learning methods make complex coding concepts accessible for absolute beginners
---
  • High-Quality Free Education
  • Effective Learning Content
  • Professional certification programs provide clear career advancement opportunities for students and job seekers
  • High quality educational content remains the primary draw for students seeking professional skill development
--
Complaints
  • Aggressive monetization and tiered subscription models restrict access to essential learning content
  • Aggressive monetization via the new key system restricts daily learning progress
---
  • Login and Authentication Issues
  • Technical Performance and Bugs
  • Aggressive subscription monetization and refund policies frustrate users who feel trapped by hidden charges
  • Persistent video playback failures prevent students from accessing purchased course content on mobile devices
  • Incomplete course library display prevents students from locating and resuming their purchased learning materials
--
Requests
  • Video-based course content requested to supplement existing text-based programming lessons
  • Modular app design to allow usage of specific hardware without full suite installation
----
  • Bookmark or favorites feature requested to help users organize and save courses for later
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Community-driven social layer increases time-in-app
  • 20+ language library provides broad market reach
  • B2B dashboard enables enterprise revenue streams
  • Integrated mobile IDE enables daily practice habits by removing desktop hardware dependency
  • AI-assisted development tools differentiate the curriculum from syntax-only competitors
  • Gamified streak counters reinforce daily open-app habits
---
  • Unrivaled free access model with high brand trust
  • Advanced AI tutoring integration (Khanmigo)
  • Comprehensive, expert-created video and exercise library
  • University-backed credentials provide high perceived professional value
  • Multi-language subtitle support facilitates international enterprise distribution
  • Expert-led library functions as a content moat for professional skill development
  • AI-powered role play simulations create a premium-tier value proposition
  • System-level integration with iOS SDK enables real-world app building
  • iCloud synchronization reduces friction between iPad and Mac workflows
  • Apple-created curriculum ensures high-fidelity alignment with professional SwiftUI standards
  • Strong brand authority and partnerships with major IP holders like LEGO and Minecraft.
  • Comprehensive curriculum that scales from age 5 to 18.
  • Cross-platform synchronization (Web/iOS) improves user retention.
Weaknesses
  • Frequent app crashes during lesson progression
  • Aggressive paywall expansion limits free-tier utility
  • Poor billing support responsiveness
  • New key-based monetization system restricts daily learning sessions
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific stability regressions
  • Bloated application size forces unnecessary storage usage
---
  • Critical authentication and login stability issues
  • Mobile app performance and latency compared to web
  • Less granular skill tracking than commercial rivals like IXL
  • Subscription-renewal transparency triggers high refund friction
  • Persistent login instability erodes daily active usage
  • Persistent video playback failures across mobile builds
  • Incomplete course library display prevents content discovery
  • Automated support systems fail to resolve account access issues
  • 3.7-star rating indicates friction in the learning experience
  • Lack of community-driven code review limits social retention
  • Hardware-locked to Apple devices
  • Heavy reliance on subscription revenue may alienate budget-conscious families.
  • Minecraft modding is limited to iPad, creating a fragmented experience for non-iPad users.
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreesubscription
MomentumActiveActiveActiveIntenseActiveMaintenanceIntenseIntense--
Update Cadence5 versions, ~6d avg3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~11d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions5 versions, ~93d avg5 versions5 versions--

Compare Sololearn: Learn to Code head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Sololearn: Learn to Code, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0