MARLVEL

SoloProtect Mobile vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against SoloProtect Mobile's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

SoloProtect Mobile
This App
LiveSafe
Nemesis
Peoplesafe
Contender
Crystal Alarm
Contender
ANJEL Tech
Contender
I'M SAFE - Personal Safety App
Contender
ShineTools
Peer
REMS CloudMonitoring
Peer
Equipment Touch
Peer
CowManager App
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperSoloProtect LtdLiveSafe, Inc.Peoplesafe LtdCrystal AlarmPLURIBUS Inc.FREE2LIVE TECH SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITEDShenzhen Growatt New Energy Technology Co.,LtdRems Plus LLCCarrier CorporationCowManager B.V.
CategoryBusinessUtilitiesBusinessBusinessCommunicationProductivityUtilitiesBusinessBusinessBusiness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 52.8 / 50.0 / 54.3 / 54.5 / 54.5 / 51.9 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 53.0 / 5
Ratings Count0335016522171213
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 7, 2022Jun 17, 2013Mar 31, 2020Jan 27, 2015Oct 14, 2020Nov 2, 2022Jun 16, 2021Sep 22, 2018Oct 18, 2023Sep 17, 2024
Last UpdatedApr 29, 2026Sep 2, 2025May 11, 2026Jan 12, 2026Jan 16, 2023May 13, 2026May 23, 2026May 13, 2026Apr 10, 2026May 5, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentexcellentterriblemixed--mixednegative---
Score90/10015/10045/100--55/10020/100---
Praises
  • Personal safety features provide significant peace of mind during outdoor exercise sessions
  • User interface simplicity allows for quick and easy navigation during daily activities
  • Corporate safety communication tools provide a functional way to receive emergency alerts
  • Personal safety features provide significant reassurance for individuals working in isolated environments
--
  • Anonymous specialist access provides a safe space for mental health and emotional support needs
----
Complaints-
  • Frequent application crashes and loading screen loops prevent access to critical safety features
  • Excessive battery consumption and background activity drain device power even when not in use
  • False alarm triggers and intrusive contact protocols disrupt personal time and professional focus
--
  • Authentication failures prevent new users from completing the sign up process via phone verification
  • Connectivity and stability issues
---
Requests-
  • Notification sound customization requested to ensure emergency alerts are audible during work hours
---
  • Single click emergency alert functionality is required to improve response time during critical incidents
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • 24/7 emergency dispatch center integration provides a high-stakes safety moat
  • SoloProtect Insights dashboard creates enterprise-level account lock-in
  • Institutional command-dashboard integration provides a professional response layer
  • SafeWalk and SafeRide features drive daily utility within campus environments
  • BS 8484:2022 accreditation functions as a B2B distribution barrier into enterprise lone-worker contracts.
  • Apple Watch integration provides a discreet SOS hardware trigger that mobile-only rivals cannot replicate.
--
  • Bubble social network effect drives daily active usage
  • Anonymous recording provides specialized utility for high-risk evidence collection
  • Direct hardware-level connectivity via WiFi/Bluetooth
  • Specialized utility for authorized Growatt installer base
  • Mechanic dispatch tracking provides a direct operational link between remote alerts and physical site repairs.
-
  • Automated clinical sign detection functions as a B2B distribution barrier into large-scale dairy operations
  • Ear-sensor hardware integration provides granular individual animal data unreachable by satellite-only competitors
Weaknesses
  • 0-star rating on both platforms indicates lack of user-facing engagement
  • Mobile-centric interface lacks the oversight tools found in LiveSafe
  • Frequent startup crashes prevent access to emergency features
  • Excessive background battery drain triggers user uninstalls
  • Account registration failures block new-user conversion
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap suggests platform-specific stability issues.
  • High sensitivity in emergency triggers disrupts professional focus.
--
  • Authentication failures block new user sign-ups
  • 0.83★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates poor platform-specific stability
  • Mandatory developer-option disabling creates unacceptable friction
  • 1.94-star rating indicates high friction
  • Lack of granular diagnostic logs compared to SolarAssistant
  • Lack of incident de-duplication logic forces manual alert management for facility managers.
-
  • 3.0 rating on iOS indicates significant friction in the user experience
  • Hardware-dependent model limits scalability compared to software-only agricultural management apps
Pricingsubscriptionfreesubscriptionfreefreefreefreefreefreesubscription
MomentumMaintenanceZombieMaintenance-SteadyMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-Maintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~2d avg2 versions, ~12d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~11d avg-5 versions3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~31d avg1 versions1 versions-2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~6d avg

Compare SoloProtect Mobile head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by SoloProtect Mobile, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0