Sports ScoreBoard vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Sports ScoreBoard's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperAaron HallAgiDev ABZOOMO Inc.Lukas MetzechAppcano LLCSait DemirkayaWiseGym Oy
CategorySportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSports
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.0 / 54.6 / 52.0 / 50.0 / 54.7 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count93572011,19500
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 24, 2019May 27, 2016Jul 3, 2015Jul 12, 2023Jan 24, 2017Mar 22, 2026Dec 17, 2025
Last UpdatedJul 26, 2025Jan 27, 2026Jul 3, 2015Jul 12, 2023Jun 20, 2025Apr 20, 2026Dec 24, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixedpositive--positive--
Score60/10085/100--75/100--
Praises-
  • High level of customization for team logos, colors, and fonts
--
  • Versatile scoreboard functionality supports diverse sports and casual game tracking needs effectively
  • Minimalist design and lack of intrusive advertisements improve the user experience during games
  • Screen mirroring capability allows for clear score visibility in group settings or home games
--
Complaints-
  • Lack of cloud-based game saving
--
  • Aggressive subscription paywall restricts core functionality and frustrates long-term free users
  • Technical instability and occasional glitches disrupt the scoring flow during active matches
--
Requests-
  • Granular control over penalty clock settings
--
  • Expanded player capacity and additional sport-specific features for more complex game tracking
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Specialized football automation reduces manual input friction
  • Sport-specific interfaces provide immediate utility for niche amateur rules
  • Multi-device network synchronization via local network protocols
  • HDMI and AirPlay mirroring for professional-grade venue displays
  • Flic button hardware integration for remote game control
  • Color-coded interface reduces cognitive load during active match officiating [Referee Mode]
  • Remote hardware control via 4G/5G provides a B2B distribution moat for hardware partners
  • Minimalist interface sustains high user satisfaction
  • Screen mirroring capability provides unique utility for group settings
  • Ad-free experience drives high retention for casual sessions
-
  • Dedicated member portal functions as a direct B2B distribution channel for facility services
Weaknesses
  • Zero hardware-sync capabilities
  • No monetization model to fund future development
  • Limited review volume indicates low market penetration
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user requests
  • Zero-revenue model limits development budget
  • Slower update cadence compared to subscription-backed rivals
  • No updates since 2015 [Last Updated: 2015-07-03]
  • 2-star average rating indicates poor user satisfaction [Rating: 2]
  • Zero rating count indicates low organic discovery
  • Lack of offline-first architecture limits use in remote tournament environments
  • Annual subscription model perceived as excessive for utility
  • Basic features like multi-score tracking locked behind paywall
  • Technical instability reported during active matches
-
  • Zero rating count on both iOS and Android platforms indicates low user adoption
  • Lack of social or gamified features limits long-term retention compared to category peers
Pricingfreefreefreefreesubscriptionfreefree
MomentumZombieMaintenanceZombieZombieZombieIntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence1 versions, 1 majors/6mo5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~74d avg1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~964d avg1 versions3 versions2 versions, ~1d avg

Compare Sports ScoreBoard head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Sports ScoreBoard, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0