MARLVEL

Subscription Trackerㅤ vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Subscription Trackerㅤ's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Subscription Trackerㅤ
This App
BILL Spend & Expense (Divvy)
Nemesis
Expense Tracker
Nemesis
FloresHR
Contender
BlueSolutions Spending
Contender
LeanLaw - Legal Billing Tool
Contender
iOweYou: Debt Tracker
Contender
Mooncard - note de frais
Contender
Fees Management - Student App
Contender
Igoe Mobile
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperJack FurnessBill.com, Inc.Chris LangWealthCareMobileWealthCareMobileLeanLawNikolai NobadiMoongroupGeneration NextWealthCareMobile
CategoryFinanceFinanceFinanceLifestyleHealth & FitnessBusinessFinanceFinanceFinanceBusiness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSAndroidAndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.1 / 54.8 / 53.5 / 52.1 / 52.7 / 54.4 / 50.0 / 54.4 / 54.6 / 53.0 / 5
Ratings Count4027,06024271916051,141189
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateSep 11, 2025Aug 14, 2017Aug 7, 2018Jul 10, 2025Jan 13, 2014Sep 2, 2016Jul 11, 2024Jun 23, 2022Sep 27, 2021Dec 26, 2013
Last UpdatedNov 10, 2025May 12, 2026Aug 14, 2018Feb 17, 2026Feb 17, 2026May 11, 2026Apr 24, 2026May 6, 2026May 9, 2026Apr 20, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentexcellent-mixednegativemixedpositivepositivepositivepositivemixed
Score90/100-65/10025/10040/10080/10085/10088/10085/10050/100
Praises
  • Subscription tracking functionality provides clear visibility into recurring monthly service costs
  • Privacy-focused design allows manual subscription management without requiring sensitive bank account linking
-
  • Expense tracking features provide clear visibility into personal savings and spending habits
--
  • QuickBooks integration efficiency
----
Complaints
  • Interface layout fails to scale correctly on taller screen aspect ratios
-
  • Bank synchronization failures and frequent credential reauthorization requests disrupt the automated tracking experience
  • Interface usability
-
  • Mobile interface friction
---
  • Receipt upload friction
Requests--
  • Expanded support for local banks and financial institutions in international markets like Indonesia and Kazakhstan
-------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Privacy-first manual entry architecture avoids bank-linking security friction
  • Cancellation guidance establishes user-advocacy brand authority
  • Two-way accounting sync functions as a high-switching-cost moat for accounting firms
  • AI-driven receipt matching reduces manual entry labor
  • Cross-device sync architecture ensures data consistency across hardware platforms
  • Multi-currency support enables B2B-adjacent expansion into expat and international traveler segments
  • Direct integration with benefit accounts ensures data accuracy for claims and balance checks.
  • Deep integration with specific health insurance infrastructure for RI members
  • 1-click IOLTA accounting creates high switching costs
  • Bi-directional QuickBooks sync eliminates manual reconciliation
  • Contract-based transparency model provides a clear audit trail for informal peer-to-peer agreements
  • Automated accounting-software integration functions as a B2B distribution barrier
  • Flying Blue loyalty partnership creates a unique value-add for business travelers
  • Offline-first architecture provides superior reliability for users in regions with unstable internet connectivity.
  • Specialized focus on educational institutions allows for more intuitive fee and attendance workflows.
  • Direct integration with employer-sponsored benefit accounts functions as a B2B distribution barrier
Weaknesses
  • Premium tier at $4.99/week is above category median
  • UI scaling regressions on tall-screen devices
  • Zero rating on Android platform
  • Enterprise-grade approval workflows create high friction for small teams
  • Lack of manual-entry mode limits appeal to casual users
  • Bank synchronization failures force manual entry, eroding the primary value proposition
  • Aggressive premium upselling on the homepage creates high-churn friction for free-tier users
  • 2.1★ rating on Android indicates critical usability failures.
  • Limited feature set compared to general financial trackers.
  • 2.67-star rating on 19 reviews indicates significant friction
  • Mobile interface lacks parity with desktop functionality
  • Per-user pricing model deters solo practitioners
  • Manual entry requirement creates high friction compared to receipt-scanning competitors
  • No integrated payment settlement loop forces users to exit the app
  • Lack of long-term expense trend visualization
  • Manual receipt entry for non-cardholders creates friction
  • 0.0 Android rating indicates poor visibility or adoption
  • Premium tier missing to capture value from larger institutes.
  • No cloud-save despite user requests for data redundancy.
  • 2.95★ rating reflects high-friction receipt upload process
Pricingsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfreefreesubscriptionfreemiumsubscriptionfreefree
MomentumMaintenanceActiveZombie--MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance--
Update Cadence2 versions, ~96d avg2 versions, ~5d avg3 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1404d avg--2 versions, ~19d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~13d avg2 versions, ~2d avg--

Compare Subscription Trackerㅤ head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Subscription Trackerㅤ, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0