MARLVEL

Subscription Tracker vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Subscription Tracker's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Subscription Tracker
This App
Cancel Subscriptions & Refund
Nemesis
Money manager, expense tracker
Nemesis
Igoe Mobile
Contender
BlueSolutions Spending
Contender
Flowy: Spending Tracker
Contender
LeanLaw - Legal Billing Tool
Contender
Loan Tracker: You Owe Me
Contender
iOweYou: Debt Tracker
Contender
Fees Management - Student App
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperAli AlhadyVUNYOOrange DogWealthCareMobileWealthCareMobileChiew CarolLeanLawIEVGENII IABLONSKYINikolai NobadiGeneration Next
CategoryFinanceFinanceFinanceBusinessHealth & FitnessFinanceBusinessFinanceFinanceFinance
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSAndroidAndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.2 / 54.9 / 53.0 / 52.7 / 55.0 / 54.4 / 54.5 / 50.0 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count2546857,2181891911633301,141
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99FreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 25, 2020Apr 24, 2024Oct 24, 2020Dec 26, 2013Jan 13, 2014Nov 5, 2019Sep 2, 2016Sep 10, 2016Jul 11, 2024Sep 27, 2021
Last UpdatedOct 3, 2022Apr 2, 2026May 7, 2026Apr 20, 2026Feb 17, 2026Dec 7, 2025May 11, 2026May 8, 2026Apr 24, 2026May 9, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-terribleexcellentmixedmixed-positive-positivepositive
Score-25/10085/10050/10040/100-80/100-85/10085/100
Praises-
  • Manual subscription tracking provides a clear overview of recurring monthly financial obligations
  • Minimalist interface design allows users to manage personal finances without feeling overwhelmed by complex features
---
  • QuickBooks integration efficiency
---
Complaints-
  • Aggressive paywalling prevents access to core features without an upfront annual subscription fee
  • Lack of automated bank or email integration forces tedious manual data entry for users
  • Aggressive paywall prompts during app startup interrupt the user experience and frustrate long-term loyal users
  • Receipt upload friction
--
  • Mobile interface friction
---
Requests-
  • Automated discovery of active subscriptions via bank account or email integration is required
  • Shared access functionality allows couples or families to manage joint finances within the same account
-------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Local-only storage architecture provides a privacy-first barrier against cloud-reliant competitors.
  • Home screen widgets increase daily visibility without requiring app entry.
  • IRS portal provides seasonal, high-intent traffic
  • Cross-platform availability on iOS and Android
  • Minimalist UI design sustains high organic retention
  • Multi-currency support captures cross-border financial segments
  • Manual-entry flexibility serves cash-heavy user demographics
  • Direct integration with employer-sponsored benefit accounts functions as a B2B distribution barrier
  • Deep integration with specific health insurance infrastructure for RI members
  • One-time $0.99 purchase model lowers entry friction for privacy-conscious users
  • Manual-entry architecture avoids data-privacy risks linked to bank-syncing competitors
  • 1-click IOLTA accounting creates high switching costs
  • Bi-directional QuickBooks sync eliminates manual reconciliation
  • Voice-to-Entry reduces manual logging friction
  • Money Conversations templates lower interpersonal conflict
  • Smart Money Check-Ins drive proactive retention
  • Contract-based transparency model provides a clear audit trail for informal peer-to-peer agreements
  • Offline-first architecture provides superior reliability for users in regions with unstable internet connectivity.
  • Specialized focus on educational institutions allows for more intuitive fee and attendance workflows.
Weaknesses
  • Manual entry requirement creates significant user friction.
  • Lack of multi-currency support limits international market appeal.
  • 0.21★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates inconsistent delivery
  • Manual-only entry creates high friction for users
  • Aggressive startup paywalls drive negative sentiment
  • Lack of internal transfer functionality forces redundant data entry
  • Third-party ad quality compromises brand perception
  • 2.95★ rating reflects high-friction receipt upload process
  • 2.67-star rating on 19 reviews indicates significant friction
  • Lack of cloud-sync forces manual backup management
  • Absence of wearable integration limits glanceable logging utility
  • Mobile interface lacks parity with desktop functionality
  • Per-user pricing model deters solo practitioners
  • No bank-sync integration
  • 0 rating on Android platform
  • Manual entry requirement increases user effort
  • Manual entry requirement creates high friction compared to receipt-scanning competitors
  • No integrated payment settlement loop forces users to exit the app
  • Premium tier missing to capture value from larger institutes.
  • No cloud-save despite user requests for data redundancy.
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreepaidsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumfree
MomentumZombieMaintenanceMaintenance--SteadyMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-
Update Cadence2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~1304d avg5 versions, ~16d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo--5 versions2 versions, ~19d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~47d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~13d avg-

Compare Subscription Tracker head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Subscription Tracker, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0