Supreme Court Law Reporter
Supreme Court Law Reporter is a reference tool for legal professionals providing searchable access to Supreme Court case law from 1950 to the present on iOS.
The App DNA
What makes this app unique?
Legal practitioners require reliable, historical access to case law and headnotes, which this app provides through a consolidated, offline-accessible archive.
For Legal professionals, law students, and researchers requiring access to historical and current Supreme Court case law.
What does it look like?
Key features
Full-text search access to Supreme Court case archives dating back to 1950.
Case summaries and headnotes included with every Supreme Court ruling.
Cross-referencing of case law with multiple legal citation formats.
How much does it cost?
The app operates as a free-to-use repository, likely serving as a brand extension for the publisher's existing print law reporting business.
Velocity
Dormant developmentUX improvementsShow more...
The app has reached a zombie state, with no updates released in the last 998 days. Development activity has ceased entirely, and there is no evidence of ongoing maintenance or feature support. The last recorded update provided basic headline filtering, but the lack of activity since then indicates the project is no longer being actively developed.
Who built it?
Bhagatjit Singh
3 apps tracked · Book
User Sentiment
What do users think recently?
How are ratings & reviews evolving?
Not enough recent reviews to extract reliable themes yet.
Read the full review analysisCompetition
Competitive landscape for Supreme Court Law Reporter
How's the Book market?
Supreme Court Law Reporter occupies a static niche in the Book category, relying on a 1950-present archive to maintain relevance. The lack of updates for over 990 days signals a maintenance-only posture that limits its competitive standing against dynamic legal research databases.
Read the market outlookThe rivals identified
Unlock the deeper market read.
Access the full report for freeThe Analyst's Read
Key takeaways for Supreme Court Law Reporter
Where is it heading?
The market for legal research is consolidating around platforms that offer real-time updates and cloud-based collaboration. Supreme Court Law Reporter remains exposed to technical obsolescence due to its long-term inactivity, which will likely lead to a slow decline in user engagement unless a basic maintenance cycle is restored.
- The 999-day update gap suggests the publisher views Supreme Court Law Reporter as a static reference asset rather than a growth-oriented product.
- Lack of real-time case updates forces users to seek alternative platforms for current legal research, accelerating the decline of the app's utility.
The SWOT
- Historical archive depth dating to 1950
- Established brand authority in law reporting
- AI-assisted headnote summarization for students
- Modernized search-query suggestions
Next best moves
Audit compatibility with latest iOS builds because the 999-day update gap risks app crashes → maintain baseline functionality
The counter-intuitive read
The lack of updates is not necessarily a…
Read the full takeBottom line
Supreme Court Law Reporter provides a stable, historical archive for legal professionals, but the lack of active development limits its utility against modern, subscription-based research tools. Maintaining the current repository structure is sufficient for archival purposes, but the app risks irrelevance.
Unlock 2 critical frictions, 2 market threats and the analyst’s take.
Access the full report for freeFAQ
Is Supreme Court Law Reporter suitable for real-time legal research?
Does Supreme Court Law Reporter require a subscription?
What are the limitations of using this app for legal practice?
Sources
- [1] App Store
Report last updated