Survey Junkie vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Survey Junkie's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperSurvey JunkieProdege LLCAttaPoll LtdbrandedSURVEYSGoogleTapGen Corp.Toluna SAS
CategoryLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleEntertainment
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.5 / 54.5 / 54.5 / 54.5 / 54.7 / 54.3 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count85,296223,94747,19713,278208,3873,2948,359
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMay 10, 2019Apr 12, 2017Dec 27, 2016Apr 25, 2022Oct 9, 2017Nov 22, 2018Mar 12, 2020
Last UpdatedApr 9, 2026Apr 15, 2026Feb 26, 2026Apr 13, 2026Apr 22, 2026May 4, 2026May 6, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativenegative--mixed-mixed
Score35/10025/100--65/100-45/100
Praises
  • Direct cash payouts via PayPal and bank transfers provide tangible financial rewards for active users
  • Reliable payout history for long-term users who successfully redeem gift cards
--
  • Consistent reward payouts for survey completion provide reliable small-scale financial incentives for users
-
  • The survey platform provides a reliable and accessible way to earn supplemental income through simple tasks
Complaints
  • Frequent disqualifications after completing long surveys waste user time and erode trust in the platform
  • Frequent survey disqualifications after significant time investment frustrate users post-update
--
  • Inconsistent survey frequency leaves many users without tasks for extended periods of several months
-
  • Account suspension without clear justification prevents users from redeeming earned points after significant time investment
Requests
  • Improved transparency regarding survey qualification criteria to prevent wasted time on ineligible tasks
  • Reversion to the previous app interface to restore usability and feature access
--
  • Dispute button for incorrectly flagged receipt submissions to allow for manual review of errors
-
  • Improved transparency regarding account flagging criteria would help users understand and avoid potential policy violations
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • $5 cash-out threshold lowers barrier to entry for casual users
  • Multi-vertical earning model creates high switching costs
  • Established brand trust from 24-year payout history
--
  • Native OS-level trust reduces acquisition friction
  • Direct Play credit integration creates a closed-loop retention mechanism
  • Location-based survey triggers provide unique, verified foot-traffic data
-
  • QuickCommunities enables direct brand-user feedback loops
  • TRUSTe certification demonstrates regulatory data compliance
Weaknesses
  • High disqualification rate after survey completion erodes trust
  • High survey disqualification rates frustrate users
  • Recent interface changes reduced navigation efficiency
  • Removal of receipt scanning features
--
  • Inconsistent survey cadence across months
  • Lack of dispute mechanism for receipt scanning errors
  • No support channel for balance discrepancies
-
  • High account suspension rate near payout thresholds
  • Extended reward processing times create user friction
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceActiveIntenseActiveIntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence3 versions, ~19d avg4 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~73d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions, ~7d avg5 versions5 versions, ~25d avg

Compare Survey Junkie head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Survey Junkie, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0