Tanuki for GitLab
For software developers and DevOps engineers who use GitLab and require a native, lightweight mobile interface to manage projects on the go.
Tanuki for GitLab is an established developer tools app that is a paid app. With a 5.0/5 rating from 1 reviews, it shows polarized user reception.
What is Tanuki for GitLab?
Current Momentum
v2.0 · 5d ago
ActiveTanuki for GitLab introduced search functionality for user, group, and project issue lists in version 2.0.10. The app has maintained a consistent cadence of feature-rich updates over the last three months.
Active Nemesis
Git client - Working Copy
By Anders Borum
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
Developer ToolsRating Pulse 🇺🇸
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
What Are The Key Features?
Built specifically for Apple platforms for performance and system integration.
View and search through user, group, and project issue lists.
Capability to update and manage the state of epics within the app.
How much does it cost?
- $0.99 one-time purchase
The app uses a low-cost, non-recurring model to appeal to individual developers looking for a simple utility without subscription fatigue.
Who Built It?
Portfolio
2
Apps
What other apps does Felix Schindler make?
Explore the full Felix Schindler report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Felix Schindler.
What do users think recently?
Analysis in progress, available soon
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for Tanuki for GitLab?
How's The Developer Tools Market?
How does it evolve in the Developer Tools market?
Rank progression
48 active rankings tracked — 30-day window
The rivals identified
The outtake for Tanuki for GitLab
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Native performance on Apple platforms
- Low-cost one-time purchase model
- Minimalist, developer-focused UI
Critical Frictions
- Low user feedback volume (1 rating)
- Thin client limitations (no local Git binary)
- Falling category rank (↓17)
Growth Levers
- Adoption of iOS Shortcuts and Multi-window support
- Implementation of File Provider capabilities
- Expansion of Agile reporting tools
Market Threats
- Working Copy's dominant local Git implementation
- Jira Cloud's enterprise-grade Agile reporting
- Trello's no-code automation features
What are the next best moves?
Implement iOS Shortcuts and Multi-window support
Competitor 'Working Copy' uses these features to create platform-wide workflows that Tanuki currently cannot match.
Develop a File Provider extension
This would allow Tanuki to integrate with mobile IDEs like Textastic, a key differentiator used by its nemesis to lock in power users.
Incentivize user reviews
With only 1 rating and a falling rank (#47, ↓17), the app lacks the social proof necessary to sustain a paid acquisition model.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Full local Git binary for offline commits (available in Working Copy)
- iOS File Provider support (available in Working Copy)
- Advanced Agile reporting/Burndown charts (available in Jira Cloud)
- No-code task automation (available in Trello)
Key Takeaways
If I were the PM, I would prioritize deep iOS system integration (Shortcuts/File Provider) to move beyond being a 'thin client.' While the native performance is a strength, the app risks irrelevance against Working Copy's robust local Git features and Jira's enterprise reporting unless it carves out a specific workflow niche.
Where Is It Heading?
Mixed Signals
v2.0.10 update in April 2026 shows active feature investment in search and epic management.
Rank dropped 17 places to #47 Paid in US Category 6026, suggesting declining momentum.
Maintains a 5.0 rating but on a statistically insignificant sample size of 1 rating.