Report updated Jun 19, 2026
Teamup Calendar
For businesses, educational institutions, and organizations requiring shared scheduling, resource management, and granular access control.
Teamup Calendar is a well-regarded business app that is free with in-app purchases. With a 4.7/5 rating from 13.7K reviews, it maintains solid user satisfaction. Users particularly appreciate granular permission controls for team coordination, though lack of full administrative features in the mobile app remains a common concern.
What is Teamup Calendar?
Teamup Calendar is a shared scheduling app for groups and organizations, providing multi-view visualization and granular access controls across mobile and web platforms.
Users hire Teamup to coordinate complex resource availability and team schedules without exposing sensitive administrative settings to all participants.
Current Momentum
v2.22 · 2w ago
Maintenance- Maintains consistent European business chart presence.
- Ships regular stability updates across platforms.
Active Nemesis
CalenGoo - Calendar and Tasks
By Gunia UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
Other Rivals
7-Day Rank Pulse 🇺🇸
BusinessNo ranking data
Rating Pulse 🇺🇸
Recent User Mood
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
Loading...
What Are The Key Features?
Nine levels of access control managed by the administrator to restrict user visibility and editing capabilities
Twelve distinct calendar layouts including Timeline, Scheduler, and Table views for data organization
Ability to add text, number, and choice fields to calendar events for structured data collection
How much does it cost?
- Free version for small teams and evaluation
- Paid plans for complex use cases and large organizations
Freemium model uses a free tier for acquisition and evaluation, gating advanced administrative and enterprise features behind paid plans.
Who Built It?
Enrichment in progress
Publisher profile available very soon
What other apps does Teamup Solutions AG make?
What do users think recently?
High confidence · Latest 100 of 280 total reviews analyzed
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a excited sentiment. Users appreciate granular permission controls for team coordination, but report lack of full administrative features in the mobile app.
What Users Love
What Frustrates Users
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for Teamup Calendar?
Where is it available?
Localized markets (1)
How's The Business Market?
How does it evolve in the Business market?
Teamup maintains a stable presence in European business charts, including #190 in Germany and #170 in Switzerland. The gap between its web-based administrative power and mobile-app utility defines its competitive ceiling against native-first rivals.
Rank progression
21 active rankings tracked — 30-day window
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
CalenGoo competes directly by offering a high-performance, power-user alternative for managing complex schedules and task lists that overlap with Teamup’s group-coordination focus.
Differentiators
- Offers a robust direct sync engine that bypasses standard cloud limitations for power users
- Integrates tasks directly into the calendar view, providing a unified workflow for busy professionals
- Supports floating events that allow for flexible scheduling without fixed time slots or dates
Head to head
Teamup should focus on simplifying the onboarding for group admins while maintaining its collaborative edge, as CalenGoo dominates the individual power-user segment.
Contenders(4)
This app competes for the professional scheduling segment, specifically targeting shift-based workers who require specialized time-tracking features.
Yandex Calendar is a broad-market competitor that leverages ecosystem integration to capture users looking for a standard, multi-calendar management tool.
Differentiators
- Seamless account switching capabilities that allow users to manage multiple identities within one app
- Native dark theme and push notification customization that improves the overall mobile user experience
WidgetCal competes by prioritizing visual accessibility and home-screen utility, appealing to users who want calendar data at a glance.
Differentiators
- Advanced lock-screen and notification center widgets that provide faster data access than Teamup
- Offers premium customization options for widget aesthetics that cater to personal branding preferences
FamCal targets the same collaborative scheduling market as Teamup but focuses specifically on the domestic and family-unit use case.
Differentiators
- Built-in task delegation features specifically designed for household management and family chores
- Includes shared memo functionality that acts as a digital bulletin board for family communication
Same space(3)
This app competes for user engagement in the productivity space by managing essential personal appointments and government-related tasks.
Zendesk occupies the business productivity space, competing for the same professional users who need to manage time and tasks efficiently.
This platform competes for the business user's time by providing communication and management tools that overlap with Teamup's organizational goals.
Compare Teamup Calendar against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for Teamup Calendar
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- 9-level permission system functions as a B2B distribution barrier
- 20-language support enables international market penetration
- Web-based administration console reduces mobile-app maintenance overhead
Critical Frictions
- Mobile-app lacks full administrative parity
- Reliance on web-browser for configuration increases churn risk
- 0.2★ rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
Growth Levers
- Develop wearable companion apps for field-service workers
- Integrate automated timesheet reporting for hourly-paid professional users
Market Threats
- CalenGoo's direct sync engine siphons power users
- Shift-specific apps capture labor-intensive business segments
- Browser-first architecture limits offline-first utility
What are the next best moves?
Ship mobile-native administrative settings because user complaints flag browser-dependency as a top friction point → increase mobile retention.
User complaints consistently cite the inability to manage settings within the app as a primary frustration.
Trade-off: Push the wearable companion app sprint to Q4 — wearable demand is lower than core administrative parity requests.
Audit Android-iOS feature parity because the 0.2★ rating gap suggests platform-specific regressions → improve Android rating baseline.
The rating delta between platforms indicates a potential quality gap in the Android build.
Trade-off: Pause the UI refresh for the web-based dashboard — platform stability is a higher churn risk.
A counter-intuitive read
The reliance on a web-based administration console is a feature, not a bug, as it allows Teamup to maintain a lightweight mobile footprint while offloading complex configuration to a more capable interface.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Direct sync engine (available in CalenGoo but missing here)
- Automated timesheet reporting (available in My Shift Planner but missing here)
Key Takeaways
Teamup maintains a strong B2B position through its granular permission system, but the browser-dependent administrative workflow creates a vulnerability to mobile-native rivals, so the PM should prioritize mobile-native parity to defend the user base.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
The market for group scheduling is consolidating around tools that offer unified mobile-native experiences, putting pressure on Teamup's browser-dependent architecture. While the current B2B permission model provides a strong defensive position, the PM must address mobile-app parity to prevent power users from migrating to native-first competitors.
Consistent chart presence in European business markets indicates strong product-market fit for SMBs and organizational scheduling.
Mobile-app administrative limitations force users into browser workflows, which creates a churn risk as competitors offer more unified mobile-native experiences.