Tennis Stats & Score vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Tennis Stats & Score's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

ScorePadel
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperLearrocket Productions, LLCMatchTrackANDREAROSARIO CENSABELLAOpenCourt, Inc.THE PADELISTRafah AlsabahPadel Mates International ABMaro HagopianNICHOLAS JASPER DILLON
CategorySportsSportsSportsSportsSportsGamesSportsSportsSports
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.0 / 54.6 / 55.0 / 54.6 / 53.4 / 52.3 / 54.7 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count122792105343600
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99
Release DateJan 2, 2022May 11, 2015Nov 10, 2023Nov 11, 2024Jul 27, 2022Aug 19, 2022Sep 29, 2020May 2, 2026Apr 17, 2026
Last UpdatedJun 17, 2022Apr 23, 2026Jan 20, 2026Apr 30, 2026Apr 25, 2026Sep 24, 2024Mar 20, 2026May 2, 2026Apr 24, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-positivemixedexcellentterribleexcellentpositive--
Score-75/10065/10090/10010/10090/10085/100--
Praises-
  • Detailed statistical tracking provides valuable insights for competitive tennis players and coaches
  • Simple game score tracking functionality provides utility for casual players during matches
  • Court booking functionality allows users to secure playing time in seconds without complex navigation
-
  • High-quality visual rendering provides a satisfying experience for users during their gameplay sessions
  • Ease of finding local matches
--
Complaints-
  • Unreliable data persistence leads to significant loss of match history and player stats
  • Aggressive advertisement frequency during active gameplay interrupts the user experience significantly
-
  • Application fails to load or initialize on Android devices entirely
  • Phone number verification process fails to send required authentication codes
-
  • Regional booking availability
--
Requests-
  • Integration with wearable devices would allow for hands-free scorekeeping during active play
  • Implementation of a match tiebreaker feature to improve competitive scoring accuracy
---
  • Facility calendar sync
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Lightweight coaching-centric interface enables rapid data entry during live play
  • Granular stat-tracking provides specific value for technical performance analysis
  • Professional-grade shot charting provides a specialized utility moat
  • Live broadcasting generates viral acquisition surfaces
  • Lightweight interface tailored for Padel-specific scoring rules
  • Persistent match history increases user switching costs
  • White-label branding increases club-level switching costs
  • Access controls enable unmanned 24/7 operations
  • Performance-based ranking system drives recurring session frequency
  • Direct club integration facilitates transaction volume
  • Global leaderboard system drives session frequency via competitive loops
  • Skill-based match algorithm sustains partner liquidity
  • Automated cost-splitting reduces friction in group bookings
  • Spoiler-free viewing mode differentiates from high-frequency notification aggregators
  • Luxury hotel directory creates a unique travel-utility niche
  • Standalone watch-first architecture removes phone-dependency friction
  • One-time $0.99 price point lowers entry barrier
Weaknesses
  • No cloud-sync functionality risks data loss across devices
  • 12 total ratings indicate low brand awareness
  • Local-only storage prevents long-term user retention
  • Unreliable data persistence causes match history loss
  • Lack of functional ad-removal purchase path
  • Aggressive ad-cadence during active scoring
  • No offline-first data persistence
  • 0.7★ rating gap between platforms
  • B2B-only sales model limits organic consumer growth
  • Low review volume hinders social proof
  • Critical onboarding failure on Android devices
  • Phone verification errors block new user acquisition
  • 0.0 rating on Android indicates total platform failure
  • 2.33-star rating indicates poor user reception
  • No cloud-save functionality despite competitive standards
  • No enterprise-grade facility management suite
  • PRO tier pricing exceeds category median
  • No live-streaming rights limits user retention
  • Community directory lacks sufficient user-generated volume
  • Lack of historical match analytics limits retention
  • No tournament-management features restricts club adoption
Pricingfreefreefreemiumunknownfreefreesubscriptionsubscriptionpaid
MomentumZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-Maintenance
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, ~185d avg2 versions, ~6d avg2 versions, ~62d avg2 versions, ~1d avg2 versions, ~492d avg2 versions, ~7d avg-1 versions, 1 majors/6mo

Compare Tennis Stats & Score head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Tennis Stats & Score, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0