MARLVEL

The Sunset Digital Watchface vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against The Sunset Digital Watchface's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

The Sunset Digital Watchface
This App
Timeless Style Watch Face
Nemesis
PRADO X25 Hybrid Watch Face
Contender
The Apogee - digital sport
Contender
Analog M3 Watch Face
Contender
NW Ace Pro Wear OS Watch Face
Contender
Apex SE Watch Face
Peer
Nomad Watch Face
Peer
Goal Zero Power
Peer
Santa Claus & Christmas
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperGW WatchfacesTime Design LLCPRADO DESIGN ® Watch FacesEnkei Designamoledwatchfaces™NeonWave Watchamoledwatchfaces™amoledwatchfaces™Goal Zero LLCRECREATIVE Watch Faces
CategoryPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationUtilitiesPersonalization
PlatformAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.4 / 54.6 / 54.3 / 54.6 / 53.4 / 50.0 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 54.4 / 54.4 / 5
Ratings Count1,8011,1837435175074831,2041,511
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$1.59$1.79$1.79FreeFree
Release DateMay 27, 2023Jan 28, 2025Sep 6, 2021Jul 22, 2022Nov 16, 2023Jul 11, 2022Jun 21, 2024Apr 4, 2024Apr 25, 2018Dec 8, 2022
Last UpdatedJun 18, 2025Dec 3, 2025Apr 14, 2026Aug 21, 2025Jul 29, 2025Jul 10, 2025Feb 23, 2026Jul 30, 2025Mar 16, 2026Aug 25, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-positivemixedpositivemixed-positivepositiveterrible-
Score-85/10065/10085/10050/100-85/10085/10025/100-
Praises--
  • Hybrid aesthetic and customization
-
  • High-resolution design and customization
-
  • High-resolution visuals and extensive material color themes
-
  • Remote power monitoring and control features provide utility for off-grid energy management
-
Complaints--
  • Ad-supported monetization and setup friction
-
  • Limited device compatibility
-
  • Friction regarding the setup of the required external companion app
-
  • Persistent connection drops and pairing failures prevent reliable remote access to power stations
  • Post-update instability causes account logout and device removal from user profiles
-
Requests--------
  • Biometric or PIN authentication to maintain persistent secure sessions without repeated manual pairing
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Minimalist design reduces cognitive load for glanceable timekeeping
  • Dual-shortcut configuration enables personalized app-launch workflows
  • Native Wear OS optimization ensures battery efficiency on Galaxy and Pixel hardware
  • Simple UI design reduces friction for casual users
  • Dedicated heart-rate trigger provides immediate utility
  • Hybrid aesthetic appeals to traditional watch users
  • Battery-efficient AOD (6-9% pixel usage) sustains retention on hardware-constrained devices
  • 25-color accent palette provides high visual personalization depth
  • 8-slot complication density provides high utility for power users
  • PNGQuant layer optimization reduces battery drain on Wear OS hardware
-
  • Low-OPR ambient mode sustains battery life on AMOLED displays
  • Material color themes (60+) provide deep aesthetic differentiation
  • OLED-optimized ambient mode reduces power consumption on high-resolution displays.
  • Granular gradient customization provides a visual differentiator for power users.
  • Remote port control functions as a hardware-switching barrier
  • AC input limit settings enable professional vehicle-integration sales
  • Animated Santa and reindeer visuals provide immediate seasonal appeal
  • Freemium model lowers the barrier to entry for casual users
Weaknesses
  • Static background variants limit visual freshness
  • HR display lacks real-time updates
  • No cloud-save functionality for user configurations
  • Lacks granular complication slots
  • No phone-battery monitoring integration
  • Ad-supported model creates user friction
  • Lack of Watch Face Format 3 integration
  • Zero revenue generation model limits reinvestment potential
  • 51 total ratings indicate low market penetration
  • 3.44-star rating indicates friction in the current user experience
  • Lack of support for rectangular watches limits the total addressable market
-
  • External companion app requirement adds setup friction
  • No native firmware-level integration limits hardware utility
  • $1.79 entry price prevents trial-based conversion.
  • Wear OS-only restriction limits the total addressable market size.
  • 1.42-star rating gap between iOS and Android
  • Persistent pairing failures reported in high-frequency reviews
  • Forced logouts post-update
  • Ad-supported companion app creates user friction
  • Lacks deep complication slots compared to power-user alternatives
  • Battery performance suffers from animation-heavy design
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreepaidpaidpaidfreefreemium
MomentumZombieZombieMaintenanceZombieZombie-MaintenanceZombieMaintenanceZombie
Update Cadence1 versions1 versions1 versions1 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo-1 versions1 versions2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~33d avg1 versions

Compare The Sunset Digital Watchface head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by The Sunset Digital Watchface, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0