MARLVEL

Time Flies Watch Faces vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Time Flies Watch Faces's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Time Flies Watch Faces
This App
Watch face Neon Plus
Peer
Digital Informer: Watch face
Peer
Triad Watch Watch Face
Peer
SamWatch Basic 3 2024
Peer
Desktop Time ZKin Watch Face
New Kid
Neon minimal MOD Classic
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperTime Flies Watch Faces10h08.com - Wear Os Watch Faceamoledwatchfaces™Time Design LLCSamtreeZKinWinWatchfaces
CategoryPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalizationPersonalization
PlatformAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 53.8 / 54.5 / 54.5 / 54.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count0253,1279891,32300
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$2.49$0.99
Release DateJul 25, 2024Sep 25, 2024May 1, 2023Jan 19, 2025Dec 14, 2021May 13, 2026Apr 27, 2026
Last UpdatedJul 4, 2025Jul 3, 2025Mar 31, 2026Dec 3, 2025Oct 16, 2024May 13, 2026Apr 27, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-mixedpositivepositivemixed--
Score-60/10085/10085/10070/100--
Praises--
  • Visual aesthetics and customization
  • Clean and minimalist design
  • Aesthetic clarity and design
--
Complaints--
  • Setup complexity
-
  • Manual installation friction
--
Requests--
  • Historical data tracking
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Modern Watch Face File format ensures platform-level energy efficiency and security compliance.
  • High-contrast neon aesthetic appeals to minimalist visual preferences
  • Granular AOD brightness control manages battery drain on specific hardware
  • PNGQuant optimization reduces battery drain [Technical Mechanism]
  • Material You design integration aligns with system themes [User Retention]
  • Minimalist grayscale aesthetic creates a distinct visual identity for users seeking simplicity.
  • 5-language localization functions as a B2B distribution barrier
  • Integrated health complications create a daily-use retention loop
  • Data-dense interface consolidates health and system metrics into a single glanceable surface.
  • Companion app architecture separates configuration complexity from the watch face interface.
  • High-contrast AMOLED design reduces battery drain on compatible hardware
  • Focused minimalist aesthetic appeals to users avoiding data-dense clutter
Weaknesses
  • Zero rating count indicates total lack of organic discovery or user engagement.
  • No IAP or ad-monetization strategy limits long-term sustainability.
  • 3.8-star rating indicates friction in the user experience
  • Lack of third-party complication support limits utility for power users
  • No historical data tracking [Feature Gap]
  • Manual BOGO cross-promotion model [Revenue Ceiling]
  • Free-only model lacks a monetization path for power users.
  • No modular complication slots limit functionality.
  • Manual multi-app download process creates high friction
  • Lack of IAP or subscription gates limits revenue capture
  • Manual email-based loyalty program creates high friction for users expecting automated digital delivery.
  • Lack of public review volume limits social proof and organic discovery velocity.
  • Zero rating count limits social proof
  • Lack of health-tracking complications trails category standards
  • No website or social presence to drive traffic
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreepaidpaid
MomentumZombieZombieMaintenanceZombieZombieZombieZombie
Update Cadence1 versions1 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo1 versions1 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo1 versions

Compare Time Flies Watch Faces head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Time Flies Watch Faces, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0