Ultimate Scoreboard vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Ultimate Scoreboard's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperAgiDev ABAaron HallSPM SPORTPLATZ MEDIA GMBHLukas MetzechZOOMO Inc.Appcano LLCSait DemirkayaUYGULAMA GELİŞTİRİCİ
CategorySportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSportsSports
PlatformiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.0 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 52.0 / 54.7 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count357930211,19500
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMay 27, 2016Nov 24, 2019Jul 15, 2020Jul 12, 2023Jul 3, 2015Jan 24, 2017Mar 22, 2026May 11, 2026
Last UpdatedJan 27, 2026Jul 26, 2025May 9, 2026Jul 12, 2023Jul 3, 2015Jun 20, 2025Apr 20, 2026May 18, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentpositivemixed---positive--
Score85/10060/100---75/100--
Praises
  • High level of customization for team logos, colors, and fonts
----
  • Versatile scoreboard functionality supports diverse sports and casual game tracking needs effectively
  • Minimalist design and lack of intrusive advertisements improve the user experience during games
  • Screen mirroring capability allows for clear score visibility in group settings or home games
--
Complaints
  • Lack of cloud-based game saving
----
  • Aggressive subscription paywall restricts core functionality and frustrates long-term free users
  • Technical instability and occasional glitches disrupt the scoring flow during active matches
--
Requests
  • Granular control over penalty clock settings
----
  • Expanded player capacity and additional sport-specific features for more complex game tracking
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Multi-device network synchronization via local network protocols
  • HDMI and AirPlay mirroring for professional-grade venue displays
  • Flic button hardware integration for remote game control
  • Specialized football automation reduces manual input friction
  • Sport-specific interfaces provide immediate utility for niche amateur rules
-
  • Remote hardware control via 4G/5G provides a B2B distribution moat for hardware partners
  • Color-coded interface reduces cognitive load during active match officiating [Referee Mode]
  • Minimalist interface sustains high user satisfaction
  • Screen mirroring capability provides unique utility for group settings
  • Ad-free experience drives high retention for casual sessions
--
Weaknesses
  • No cloud-save functionality despite user requests
  • Zero-revenue model limits development budget
  • Slower update cadence compared to subscription-backed rivals
  • Zero hardware-sync capabilities
  • No monetization model to fund future development
  • Limited review volume indicates low market penetration
-
  • Zero rating count indicates low organic discovery
  • Lack of offline-first architecture limits use in remote tournament environments
  • No updates since 2015 [Last Updated: 2015-07-03]
  • 2-star average rating indicates poor user satisfaction [Rating: 2]
  • Annual subscription model perceived as excessive for utility
  • Basic features like multi-score tracking locked behind paywall
  • Technical instability reported during active matches
--
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreesubscriptionfreefree
MomentumMaintenanceZombieIntenseZombieZombieZombieIntense-
Update Cadence5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~74d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo5 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~964d avg1 versions1 versions3 versions-

Compare Ultimate Scoreboard head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Ultimate Scoreboard, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0