Medium confidence · 11 reviews analyzed
Recent user voice shows a mixed sentiment. Users appreciate race directors find the bib-tapping interface simple and efficient for tracking participants during events and tablet-based tracking at aid stations provides greater accuracy than traditional handwritten methods for race staff, but report automatic live updates cause server-side data loss where bib numbers are dropped and not recorded and cumbersome user interface requires excessive button presses to perform basic race management tasks like publishing results.
Rating: 3.7
Reviews: 11
Confidence: medium
The latest update claims to resolve results publishing bugs and improve troubleshooting, but the small sample size of post-update data leaves the overall complaint landscape largely unchanged.
How did the latest release land?
Limited review volume (11 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.