Uptime Radar vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Uptime Radar's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Uptime Radar
This App
FireHydrant
Contender
iGotify
Contender
XDeck
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperADRIAN ALBUPushover, LLCSolarWinds Worldwide, LLCFireHydrantSonicWall Inc.Sebastian RankEnso Connect Inc.Mehmet BayramVanderMey Consulting, LLCRichard Kozyak
CategoryDeveloper ToolsUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesBusinessUtilitiesUtilitiesProductivityUtilitiesDeveloper Tools
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.8 / 53.0 / 54.3 / 54.7 / 54.4 / 52.5 / 51.0 / 55.0 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count03,14618131441224
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMay 20, 2025Mar 7, 2012Jun 4, 2013Jan 13, 2024Aug 12, 2020Apr 11, 2024Feb 25, 2023Oct 23, 2024Apr 2, 2020Dec 15, 2025
Last UpdatedApr 30, 2026May 12, 2026Dec 22, 2025Mar 16, 2026Apr 17, 2026Jan 8, 2026May 4, 2026Apr 23, 2025Oct 12, 2024Mar 29, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-positive-negative-excellentmixed-excellent-
Score-82/100-25/100-85/10045/100-90/100-
Praises-
  • Reliable push notification delivery for home automation and server monitoring scripts
-
  • Push notification delivery for incident signals provides necessary operational awareness for on-call responders
-
  • Self-hosted notification architecture provides reliable and low-latency alerts for personal server monitoring tasks
  • The core device functionality provided a reliable experience before the recent software regressions occurred
-
  • Cross-platform command execution across desktop operating systems simplifies daily automation tasks for power users
  • Integration with external automation services improves the utility of mobile device control for home environments
-
Complaints-
  • Account registration and device addition failures blocking new user onboarding
-
  • Critical alert volume management fails to revert to original levels after incident acknowledgement
-
  • Inconsistent notification delivery on mobile devices requires manual app intervention after system reboots
  • Push notification delivery failures prevent users from receiving timely updates regarding guest communications
  • Persistent login requirements and message transmission errors disrupt the workflow for property management tasks
---
Requests-
  • Customizable notification icons to replace the default overlay for better visual integration
-
  • Quick action buttons within push notifications to enable immediate incident acknowledgement without opening the app
-
  • Expanded interface customization options including home screen widgets and OLED energy-saving dark themes
  • Integrated calendar and direct booking approval features are needed to manage guest inquiries effectively
---
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Minimalist UI reduces cognitive load for status management
  • Zero-config onboarding lowers entry barrier for non-technical administrators
  • One-time payment model lowers switching costs
  • Lightweight API enables rapid integration
  • B2B team management unlocks recurring revenue
-
  • Service Catalog maps organizational structure to incident response
  • Non-privileged architecture ensures user privacy
  • WireGuard-based tunnels minimize performance overhead
  • Device posture collection enables granular access control
  • Biometric-locked access prevents unauthorized viewing of sensitive server logs
  • Local-key message decryption ensures privacy from third-party cloud providers
  • Docker integration facilitates management of containerized infrastructure
  • Specialized hospitality-centric UX avoids the complexity of generic cloud tools
  • ROI-guarantee pricing model lowers the barrier for B2B adoption
-
  • Security-focused architecture keeps scripts local to the host machine
  • Cross-platform agent support covers Windows, Mac, and Linux environments
-
Weaknesses
  • No observable subscription or IAP gates
  • Lack of API integrations restricts power-user utility
  • Notification failures post-update
  • Onboarding friction blocks new users
  • Lack of native security compliance
-
  • Mobile app crashes during page acknowledgement
  • Notification volume management requires manual intervention
  • 2.6 Android rating indicates high friction
  • Subscription model tied to specific hardware
  • Limited feature set compared to SSH tools
  • Background notification delivery fails to trigger lock screen banners
  • Accidental data deletion caused by poor UI button proximity
  • Manual app intervention required after system reboots
  • 2.5-star rating on iOS reflects critical stability regressions
  • Persistent login requirements create friction on every launch
-
  • Manual configuration overhead for commands creates a high entry barrier
  • Lack of visualized host status visibility compared to new entrants
-
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreemiumsubscriptionfreesubscriptionfreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenance-MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-ZombieActive
Update Cadence1 versions2 versions, ~0d avg-2 versions, ~23d avg2 versions, ~2d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~108d avg2 versions, ~13d avg-2 versions, ~287d avg5 versions

Compare Uptime Radar head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Uptime Radar, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0