Weight-Monitor vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Weight-Monitor's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperEssence ComputingAzumio Inc.App Sub 1 LLCApp Sub 1 LLCEvolve Medical Systems, LLCMediSafe Inc.VoluntismySugr GmbH军 刘倩 赵
CategoryMedicalMedicalMedicalMedicalMedicalMedicalMedicalMedicalMedicalMedical
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 54.5 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.5 / 54.5 / 5
Ratings Count024,57828,09114,95255,60799,62639,65630,7311,2401,183
PriceUSD1.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.99
Release DateJun 17, 2011Oct 28, 2008Jul 18, 2016Oct 15, 2017Jun 28, 2012Nov 8, 2012Mar 27, 2015Jun 3, 2013Sep 9, 2025Aug 4, 2011
Last UpdatedMar 29, 2020Apr 26, 2026Mar 2, 2026Mar 2, 2026Apr 15, 2026Feb 10, 2026Apr 14, 2026Apr 12, 2026Apr 15, 2026Oct 22, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativeterriblenegativenegative-terrible----
Score25/10015/10025/10035/100-25/100----
Praises
  • The rolling ten day average weight line provides helpful visual progress tracking for users
  • Comprehensive health tracking features allow users to monitor glucose and blood pressure effectively
  • Estimated A1C tracking provides valuable health insights for long-term diabetic management
  • The simple and logical interface allows users to track health metrics with minimal friction
-
  • Reliable medication reminders provide essential daily support for managing complex health schedules
----
Complaints
  • Persistent data entry failures and unit conversion errors prevent basic functionality for many users
  • Persistent application crashes and loading failures prevent access to critical health data
  • Aggressive subscription prompts and paywalls frustrate users attempting to access basic functionality
  • Frequent application crashes during startup or data synchronization break the daily logging habit
  • Misleading marketing regarding automatic blood glucose monitoring capabilities causes significant user frustration
  • Application crashes or fails to open entirely following recent platform updates
-
  • Frequent application crashes and interface freezes prevent users from logging medication doses
  • Aggressive transition to a paid subscription model locks users out of existing data
----
Requests
  • Users request the ability to export weight data via text or direct entry methods
  • Seamless integration with third-party health platforms for data synchronization and backup
  • Direct integration with wearable glucose monitors to eliminate the need for manual data entry
  • Integration with external health hardware and platforms to automate data entry
------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • 10-day rolling average visualization provides a unique, smoothed progress metric
  • Multi-user tab support enables household-level utility
  • 15-year market presence builds significant trust
  • Direct hardware integration creates high switching costs
  • Clinical reporting exports increase switching costs for users
  • A1C estimation provides long-term health value
  • HealthKit sync reduces data entry friction
  • Clinical category calculations based on ACC/AHA standards establish professional-grade utility
  • Multi-metric logging interface centralizes health data entry to increase daily usage frequency
-
  • Clinical-grade drug interaction engine
  • Deep integration with US health infrastructure
  • Multi-user family sync
---
  • Multi-user tracking functions as a household-level retention mechanism
  • One-time purchase model lowers the barrier to entry for price-sensitive users
Weaknesses
  • Persistent unit conversion errors
  • Data entry failures across sessions
  • Lack of intuitive UI design for long-term progress tracking
  • 2.25★ Android rating vs 4.8★ iOS rating
  • Persistent launch-time crashes on latest versions
  • Unresponsive customer support for billing issues
  • Frequent startup crashes break daily logging habits
  • Manual entry requirement contradicts marketing
  • Aggressive subscription paywalls drive refund requests
  • High refund rate due to misleading hardware-measurement marketing
  • Frequent launch failures post-update causing data loss
  • Aggressive subscription prompts during initial setup
-
  • High crash frequency post-update
  • Mandatory paywall for historical data
  • Inconsistent notification reliability
---
  • Pricing model limits development capital for high-velocity updates
  • Manual entry requirement creates friction compared to wearable-integrated rivals
Pricingpaidsubscriptionfreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreepaid
MomentumZombieMaintenanceActiveActiveIntenseActiveIntenseIntense--
Update Cadence5 versions3 versions, ~325d avg5 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~19d avg5 versions5 versions, ~11d avg5 versions5 versions--

Compare Weight-Monitor head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Weight-Monitor, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0