TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control
Universal AC Remote Control
Snapshot
Publisher DNA
What defines TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control?
AI intelligence is not yet available for TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control ship?
Apps
9 apps analysed
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Rubiks cube solver, scan or manually input to solve rubix cube, easy cube game
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Distributed across 19 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 5 of 9 apps with localized market data, more coverage rolling in as scans complete · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- United States5 / 5
- Brazil1 / 5
- Mexico1 / 5
Europe (9)
- France1 / 5
- Germany1 / 5
- Italy1 / 5
- Netherlands1 / 5
- Portugal1 / 5
›+4 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 5
- Sweden1 / 5
- Turkey1 / 5
- United Kingdom1 / 5
Asia-Pacific (7)
- Australia1 / 5
- India1 / 5
- Indonesia1 / 5
- Japan1 / 5
- Singapore1 / 5
›+2 more asia-pacific markets
- South Korea1 / 5
- Vietnam1 / 5
Core markets (5/5 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
0
Positive apps
1
Neutral / mixed
0
Negative apps
45/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(2)
This app serves the same home-control audience but specializes in the Samsung Smart TV ecosystem.
Both apps compete for the same Android utility-focused install base by offering digital replacements for physical remote hardware. They overlap in their reliance on ad-supported models to capture high-volume traffic from users seeking immediate appliance control.
Contenders(16)
It addresses the same need for smartphone-based remote control but is tailored specifically for Onn Smart TV hardware.
It expands the remote utility from air conditioners to televisions, capturing a broader home appliance control segment.
Both applications rely on the same hardware constraint, the IR blaster, to replace physical remotes for home appliances, competing for the same utility-focused Android user base.
Both apps compete for the home appliance remote control utility space, though they diverge on hardware requirements and target device types. The rival targets smart TVs via WiFi, while the source app focuses on legacy AC units using IR-blaster hardware.
Both applications target users seeking remote climate control, though they operate on different technical foundations: Universal AC Remote Control uses infrared hardware, while Midea Air requires cloud-connected smart appliances.
Both apps target users managing air conditioning units, but they diverge on connectivity: Universal AC Remote Control uses IR blasters for broad compatibility, while LLOYD requires WiFi for brand-specific hardware control.
Both applications target Android users seeking to replace physical remotes, but they diverge on connectivity: Universal TV Remote Control relies on IR hardware, while the rival utilizes Wi-Fi for Fire TV devices.
Both apps compete for the same smartphone-based home appliance control market, targeting users seeking to replace physical remotes with mobile interfaces.
Both applications target users seeking to replace physical household appliance remotes with smartphone interfaces, creating direct competition for users managing home hardware.
Both applications target Android users seeking to replace physical TV remotes with mobile interfaces, competing for the same home entertainment utility segment.
Both applications target Android users requiring IR-blaster functionality to replace physical air conditioner remotes. They compete directly for the same utility-focused user base seeking consolidated appliance management.
Both applications compete for the same Android user base seeking to replace physical remotes with smartphone-based control interfaces for home entertainment systems.
known for
Hisense Air Conditioner
Both apps compete for Android users seeking smartphone-based infrared control for home appliances, targeting the same hardware-dependent user base.
Both apps compete for the same utility-focused install base by providing digital replacements for physical home appliance remotes. They overlap in their core function of replicating physical remote commands through mobile interfaces.
Both apps compete for the same home-utility screen real estate on Android, targeting users who want to consolidate physical remotes into a single mobile interface.
Both apps target users seeking consolidated digital control for home appliances, competing for the same utility-focused audience on mobile devices.
Same space(6)
This app competes for the same screen-time by providing a universal remote interface for smart TVs via Wi-Fi.
This app provides a similar air conditioner control experience but emphasizes a modern interface design.
This app targets the same Android user base but focuses on Wi-Fi-based streaming hardware rather than infrared-dependent appliances.
This app provides a secondary entertainment utility by focusing on wireless media casting and screen sharing rather than basic remote navigation.
This app expands the home control utility space by targeting non-TV appliances like fans, complementing the primary TV remote functionality.
known for
Air Conditioner Controller
This is a direct functional alternative for air conditioner management, targeting the same core utility as the source app.
New entrants(2)
This app occupies the same mobile-remote space but focuses on the Roku streaming platform.
This app serves as a direct functional peer by offering a hybrid connectivity model that bridges the gap between Wi-Fi and IR hardware.
