TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control
Snapshot
Publisher DNA
What defines TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control?
AI intelligence is not yet available for TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control ship?
Apps
9 apps analysed
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Rubiks cube solver, scan or manually input to solve rubix cube, easy cube game
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Distributed across 19 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 5 of 9 apps with localized market data, more coverage rolling in as scans complete · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- United States5 / 5
- Brazil1 / 5
- Mexico1 / 5
Europe (9)
- France1 / 5
- Germany1 / 5
- Italy1 / 5
- Netherlands1 / 5
- Portugal1 / 5
›+4 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 5
- Sweden1 / 5
- Turkey1 / 5
- United Kingdom1 / 5
Asia-Pacific (7)
- Australia1 / 5
- India1 / 5
- Indonesia1 / 5
- Japan1 / 5
- Singapore1 / 5
›+2 more asia-pacific markets
- South Korea1 / 5
- Vietnam1 / 5
Core markets (5/5 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
0
Positive apps
1
Neutral / mixed
0
Negative apps
45/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(2)
This app serves the same audience of users looking to replace physical remotes, but it focuses on a specific brand ecosystem to ensure stability.
Both apps compete for the same utility category by replacing physical home remotes with smartphone-based interfaces, targeting users seeking to consolidate control over their household electronics.
Contenders(16)
This app provides a similar utility for TV control but offers dual connectivity options, supporting both Wi-Fi for smart TVs and IR for traditional models.
Both applications target users seeking to replace physical home appliance remotes with mobile interfaces, though they utilize different connectivity protocols: infrared blasters versus WiFi networks.
Both applications rely on the same hardware constraint, the IR blaster, to replace physical remotes for home appliances, competing for the same utility-focused Android user base.
Both applications compete for the same home entertainment audience by providing smartphone-based control interfaces to replace physical remotes.
Both applications target users managing air conditioning units, but they diverge on connectivity: Universal AC Remote Control relies on IR blasters for legacy hardware, while Lloyd Smart AC Remote Control requires specific WiFi-enabled hardware.
Both apps target the same user base of IR-blaster smartphone owners seeking to consolidate home appliance remotes into a single digital interface.
Both applications target Android users seeking to replace physical remotes, but they diverge on connectivity: Universal TV Remote Control relies on IR hardware, while the rival utilizes Wi-Fi for Fire TV devices.
Both applications target users seeking to consolidate control of household appliances via smartphone, creating direct competition for the same utility-focused user base.
Both apps target the same utility-seeking audience by providing universal brand compatibility for air conditioner control. They compete directly for users looking to replace physical remotes with digital alternatives.
Both applications target Android users seeking to replace physical TV remotes with mobile interfaces, competing for the same home entertainment utility segment.
Both applications target the same Android user base seeking to replace physical infrared remotes with a consolidated mobile interface for home climate management.
Both applications compete for the same Android user base seeking to replace physical remotes with smartphone-based control interfaces for home entertainment systems.
Both applications target the same Android user base seeking to replace physical television remotes, competing directly on feature set and store visibility within the home entertainment utility category.
Both apps target the same Android user base seeking digital replacements for physical infrared remotes, creating direct competition for device control utility.
known for
Hisense Air Conditioner
Both applications target users with IR-blaster equipped smartphones seeking to replace physical home appliance remotes. They compete directly for the same utility-focused audience looking to consolidate control of household devices.
Both apps compete for the same mobile-as-remote utility space, targeting users who want to consolidate physical controllers into a single smartphone interface.
Same space(9)
This app targets the same audience by providing a unified remote interface for multiple TV brands, including Roku and Fire TV.
This app competes for the same screen time by offering a broader smart TV control solution that includes screen mirroring features.
This app targets the same user base seeking to replace lost physical remotes, but focuses on Roku-specific Wi-Fi connectivity rather than IR-based appliance control.
This app addresses the same need for a digital remote replacement, specifically targeting Amazon Fire TV users through Wi-Fi connectivity.
This app provides a secondary entertainment utility by focusing on wireless media casting and screen sharing rather than basic remote navigation.
This app expands the home control utility space by targeting non-TV appliances like fans, complementing the primary TV remote functionality.
This app competes for the same user base by providing a multi-protocol remote that includes Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, and IR-blaster support.
known for
Air Conditioner Controller
This app serves the same niche of air conditioner management, adding energy monitoring features to the standard remote control utility.
This app is a direct functional equivalent for air conditioner control, targeting the same user base with a focus on universal brand compatibility.