TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control
Universal AC Remote Control
Publisher DNA
What defines TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control?
AI intelligence is not yet available for TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control. The portfolio data below is up to date.
Portfolio
What does TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control ship?
Apps
9 apps analysed
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Analysis in progress
Distributed across 19 markets, strongest in Europe.
Based on 5 of 9 apps with localized market data, more coverage rolling in as scans complete · last scanned .
Americas (3)
- United States5 / 5
- Brazil1 / 5
- Mexico1 / 5
Europe (9)
- France1 / 5
- Germany1 / 5
- Italy1 / 5
- Netherlands1 / 5
- Portugal1 / 5
›+4 more europe markets
- Spain1 / 5
- Sweden1 / 5
- Turkey1 / 5
- United Kingdom1 / 5
Asia-Pacific (7)
- Australia1 / 5
- India1 / 5
- Indonesia1 / 5
- Japan1 / 5
- Singapore1 / 5
›+2 more asia-pacific markets
- South Korea1 / 5
- Vietnam1 / 5
Core markets (5/5 apps)
User Sentiment
How do users feel about their apps?
0
Positive apps
1
Neutral / mixed
0
Negative apps
45/100
Avg sentiment score
Rivals
Who does TV Master - Smart TV Remote Control compete with?
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
Both applications compete for the same Android user base seeking digital alternatives to physical television controllers. They overlap in the utility category by providing remote functionality for home entertainment systems.
Contenders(6)
Both applications rely on the same hardware constraint, the IR blaster, to replace physical remotes for home appliances, competing for the same utility-focused Android user base.
Both applications compete for the same home entertainment audience by providing smartphone-based control interfaces to replace physical remotes.
Both applications target Android users seeking to replace physical remotes, but they diverge on connectivity: Universal TV Remote Control relies on IR hardware, while the rival utilizes Wi-Fi for Fire TV devices.
Both applications target Android users seeking to replace physical TV remotes with mobile interfaces, competing for the same home entertainment utility segment.
Both applications compete for the same Android user base seeking to replace physical remotes with smartphone-based control interfaces for home entertainment systems.
Both applications target the same Android user base seeking to replace physical television remotes, competing directly on feature set and store visibility within the home entertainment utility category.
Same space(2)
This app provides a secondary entertainment utility by focusing on wireless media casting and screen sharing rather than basic remote navigation.
This app expands the home control utility space by targeting non-TV appliances like fans, complementing the primary TV remote functionality.
New entrants(1)
This app serves as a direct functional peer by offering a hybrid connectivity model that bridges the gap between Wi-Fi and IR hardware.