Report updated Jun 19, 2026
100 Years' War
For strategy gamers interested in historical medieval warfare and tactical turn-based combat.
100 Years' War is a challenged games app that is a paid app. With a 2.7/5 rating from 18 reviews, it faces significant user friction. Users particularly appreciate historical scenario depth provides significant challenge for dedicated strategy enthusiasts, though artificial intelligence failure prevents victory recognition and blocks campaign progression remains a common concern.
What is 100 Years' War?
100 Years' War is a turn-based historical strategy game for iOS featuring medieval combat campaigns.
Users hire the app for deep, historically-themed tactical challenges, but the current technical state prevents them from completing the campaigns they purchased.
Current Momentum
v5.3 · 17mo ago
ZombieLast updated 518d ago. 5 versions tracked.
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
What Are The Key Features?
Multi-mission campaigns themed around historical English and French conflicts with playable sides for both factions
Tactical management of over 30 unique medieval units including knights, billmen, and longbowmen
Purchasable expansion packs for the Lancastrian Phase and Loire campaigns
Detailed reference charts and combat analysis tools for evaluating flank attacks and strategic movement
How much does it cost?
- Base game at $2.99
- Additional campaigns available via in-app purchase
Paid model anchored at $2.99 with supplemental revenue generated through campaign-specific IAP.
Who Built It?
Hunted Cow Studios
Providing deep-dive historical wargaming experiences for strategy enthusiasts. Delivering tactical simulations of pivotal military conflicts.
Portfolio
13
Apps
What other apps does Hunted Cow Studios make?
Explore the full Hunted Cow Studios report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Hunted Cow Studios.
What do users think recently?
Low confidence · 13 reviews analyzed
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate historical scenario depth provides significant challenge for dedicated strategy enthusiasts, but report artificial intelligence failure prevents victory recognition and blocks campaign progression and extreme difficulty imbalance makes specific campaign missions impossible to complete.
Limited review volume (13 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for 100 Years' War?
How's The Games Market?
Market outlook for this category
Available very soon
The rivals identified
Same space(4)
A niche strategy title that emphasizes atmospheric, side-scrolling resource management and base defense mechanics.
Differentiators
- Employs a unique side-scrolling perspective that simplifies complex strategy mechanics into intuitive, gesture-based interactions.
- Focuses on cooperative multiplayer gameplay, allowing two players to manage a kingdom simultaneously on one device.
Provides a polished real-time tactical experience that competes for the same core strategy-focused audience.
Differentiators
- Integrates hero-based progression systems that add RPG-like depth to standard real-time strategy combat encounters.
- Offers a highly refined touch-optimized interface that reduces input friction compared to traditional PC-to-mobile ports.
A high-fidelity turn-based strategy game that sets the standard for mobile 4X tactical experiences.
Differentiators
- Features a low-poly aesthetic that prioritizes visual clarity and performance across diverse mobile hardware configurations.
- Implements a sophisticated multiplayer matchmaking system that sustains long-term retention beyond the initial single-player campaign.
While a different theme, it dominates the strategy-simulation category with a massive, highly-engaged user base.
Differentiators
- Utilizes a global simulation engine that provides significantly higher replayability than static historical campaign maps.
- Monetization relies on a robust expansion and scenario-editor model rather than simple upfront purchase pricing.
Compare 100 Years' War against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for 100 Years' War
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Historical scenario depth provides a distinct niche for strategy enthusiasts
- Expansion-based IAP model creates clear paths for revenue growth
Critical Frictions
- 2.72-star rating reflects persistent AI logic failures
- No mission-skip mechanism forces churn when players hit progression blockers
Growth Levers
- Implementing a manual mission-skip feature would unlock access to purchased content
- Adding multiplayer functionality would increase replay value
Market Threats
- High-fidelity competitors like Polytopia+ offer superior retention loops
- Technical instability risks permanent brand damage
What are the next best moves?
Ship mission-skip feature because AI progression blockers are the top complaint → reduce churn
High-frequency complaint theme regarding AI failure and mission impossibility.
Trade-off: Pause work on the next expansion campaign — stability is the priority.
Audit AI deployment logic because players report units stop spawning → restore campaign flow
AI failure is the primary blocker for campaign progression.
Trade-off: Same-quarter capacity available — no major lever displaced.
A counter-intuitive read
The game's primary risk is not the lack of content, but the fact that players are currently unable to access the content they have already purchased due to technical blockers.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Multiplayer matchmaking (available in The Battle of Polytopia+ but missing here)
- Cooperative local play (available in Kingdom Two Crowns+ but missing here)
Key Takeaways
The app provides a strong tactical foundation for history enthusiasts, but persistent AI failures and progression blockers erode the user experience, so the PM must prioritize a mission-skip feature to prevent further churn.
Where Is It Heading?
Declining
The strategy market is consolidating around titles with high-fidelity multiplayer and stable progression, leaving 100 Years' War exposed. Without addressing the core AI and progression blockers, the title will continue to lose its niche audience to more reliable competitors.
Persistent AI logic failures block campaign progression, which directly causes user churn and negative sentiment.
The lack of a mission-skip mechanism forces players to abandon the game when facing difficulty spikes.