| Core Identity |
| Developer | Ag Leader Technology | Performance Livestock Analytics | Softwerk AB | Stara SA Industria de Implementos Agricolas | Next Gen Ag Tech | CropIn Technology Solutions Private Limited | The Climate Corporation - US | Gallagher Group Ltd | AgriWebb | Pasturemap Inc. |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity | Education | Productivity | Business | Business | Productivity | Productivity | Productivity | Business |
| Platform | Android, iOS | iOS | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android | iOS, Android |
| Store Metrics |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 | 0.0 / 5 | 0.0 / 5 | 0.0 / 5 | 0.0 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 | 2.9 / 5 |
| Ratings Count | 12 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 170 | 4 | 13 | 18 |
| Price | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free | Free |
| Release Date | Apr 15, 2019 | Feb 2, 2017 | Aug 25, 2023 | Aug 20, 2021 | Dec 11, 2024 | Sep 8, 2020 | Feb 17, 2012 | Feb 4, 2021 | May 3, 2017 | Aug 24, 2023 |
| Last Updated | Nov 11, 2025 | Sep 20, 2022 | Feb 28, 2025 | Apr 23, 2026 | May 13, 2026 | May 7, 2026 | Apr 15, 2026 | May 12, 2026 | May 7, 2026 | Apr 28, 2026 |
| Sentiment & Reviews |
| Sentiment | mixed | - | - | - | - | - | mixed | - | - | negative |
| Score | 55/100 | - | - | - | - | - | 45/100 | - | - | 30/100 |
| Praises | - Agronomic data review and equipment tracking provide value for field operations
| - | - | - | - | - | - Data visualization tools provide actionable insights for field management and hybrid selection decisions
- Cross-platform hardware compatibility allows farmers to monitor diverse machinery brands in one place
| - | - | - Map overview functionality provides clear visibility into rest days for pasture management
|
| Complaints | - Login errors and connectivity failures prevent data access in the field
- Outdated interface design makes the application difficult to navigate for users
| - | - | - | - | - | - Inaccurate acre counting and field mapping data erode trust in the platform for operational planning
- Subscription requirements for basic data access create friction for long-term agricultural users
| - | - | - Navigation and editing complexity in the latest version hinders core pasture management workflows
|
| Requests | - Localized language support for Japanese users to improve regional usability
| - | - | - | - | - | - Customizable color palettes for maps are required to support colorblind users in field analysis
| - | - | - Search functionality for gates and fencers is required to improve navigation efficiency
|
| Strategic Intel |
| Strengths | - Third-party data integration reduces switching costs for mixed-fleet operators
- Remote display access provides a direct B2B revenue gate
| - Bluetooth scale integration automates feed delivery data entry
- Advisor access creates a B2B distribution moat via nutritionists
| - Satellite-based crop health analysis enables granular input savings
- Role-based access control secures enterprise-level organizational hierarchies
| - Hardware-integrated telemetry provides high-fidelity machine performance data
- Free utility model lowers barrier to entry for Stara customers
| - Bilingual interface (English/Spanish) lowers adoption barriers for diverse yard-level workforces
- Cloud-native architecture enables faster feature iteration than legacy-heavy competitors
| - Proprietary crop knowledge grid of 399+ crops provides predictive intelligence moat
- Centralized platform architecture maps complex multi-season project data for enterprise supply chains
| - Proprietary hardware-software integration creates high switching costs
- Cross-platform machinery compatibility aggregates diverse fleet data
| - Proprietary hardware-sync creates high switching costs
- Automated compliance reporting functions as regulatory moat
| - Interactive map-based interface simplifies paddock management for non-technical users
- Unlimited user access model removes friction for team-wide adoption
| - Offline GPS mapping ensures utility in remote field environments
- Grazing charting functions as a paid-tier gate for Pro subscribers
|
| Weaknesses | - Login failures and GPS inaccuracy hinder daily field use
- Interface design is described as clunky and outdated
| - Demo-request sales model limits top-of-funnel conversion
- No offline mode despite remote operational environments
| - Zero rating count across major platforms
- Lack of real-time hardware data feeds
| - Zero public rating volume limits social proof
- Closed-loop design prevents data ingestion from non-Stara machinery
| - Manual data entry requirements create high administrative friction
- No native hardware API integrations for automated weight tracking
| - Closed-access RFP process limits organic discovery compared to self-serve competitors
- Lack of public-facing pricing creates friction for smaller cooperative leads
| - Inaccurate acre counting and mapping data
- Subscription-gated access to historical data
- Connectivity instability with field hardware
| - Zero Android rating count indicates poor adoption
- Lack of collaborative team features limits utility
| - No direct EID reader integration for automated data entry
- Lack of automated compliance reporting for regional agricultural standards
| - Data-loss reports following the latest update
- Geometric drawing limitations in pasture subdivision
- 0.86★ Android-iOS rating gap
|
| Pricing | freemium | subscription | subscription | free | free | paid | freemium | free | freemium | subscription |
| Momentum | Maintenance | Zombie | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance | Maintenance |
| Update Cadence | 2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~168d avg | 1 versions | 2 versions, ~7d avg | 2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg | 2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~1d avg | 2 versions, ~0d avg | 2 versions, ~22d avg | 2 versions, ~4d avg | 2 versions, ~1d avg | 2 versions, ~1d avg |
