Anaplan vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Anaplan's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Anaplan
This App
MarketMan
Nemesis
MarketUP ERP
Contender
iFactura
Contender
UctoSken
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperAnaplan, Inc.MarketMan LTDmarketup.comTito PeraltaMicrosoft CorporationSpotOn Transact, IncFlipcause, Inc.PT. TokopediaJIRI CHOMATFemi Akindehinde
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessProductivityProductivityProductivityBusinessBusinessProductivityProductivity
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 52.5 / 52.5 / 50.0 / 54.8 / 53.4 / 54.8 / 51.7 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count2146401,395,2341721901
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateSep 30, 2019Aug 28, 2013Sep 22, 2018Oct 25, 2022Mar 27, 2014Feb 14, 2015Dec 16, 2017Sep 19, 2024Mar 16, 2026Jan 25, 2026
Last UpdatedMay 26, 2026Mar 10, 2026Apr 26, 2026Apr 1, 2026May 18, 2026Aug 3, 2021Sep 23, 2025May 11, 2026Mar 16, 2026Feb 20, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-terriblenegative-mixedmixedpositive---
Score-25/10025/100-45/10045/10085/100---
Praises-
  • Inventory management features provide significant utility for restaurant owners tracking cost of goods sold
  • Small business owners value the free access to essential ERP management tools
  • Document generation features provide high utility for professional business operations
-
  • Core spreadsheet functionality provides reliable utility for personal finance and medication tracking
  • Real-time sales reporting provides business owners with immediate visibility into daily performance metrics
----
Complaints-
  • Frequent application crashes and instability prevent reliable use during critical restaurant inventory counting sessions
  • Critical login and account creation failures prevent new users from accessing the system
  • Application instability and infinite loading screens disrupt daily business workflows
  • Inconsistent session management forces frequent re-authentication during active work sessions
-
  • Cumbersome authentication and security protocols block access for legitimate paying subscribers
  • Frequent forced logouts disrupt daily business monitoring and require repetitive manual authentication
  • Application launch failures on mobile devices prevent users from accessing their account information
----
Requests-
  • Autosave functionality for stock counts is required to prevent total data loss during interruptions
  • Persistent login sessions are required to avoid constant re-authentication during work
  • Feature parity between mobile and desktop versions for core management tasks
-
  • Simplified login and authentication processes to allow faster access to personal files
  • Implementation of biometric authentication to simplify access and reduce the burden of frequent logins
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Enterprise-grade modeling capabilities for complex, multi-dimensional financial scenarios
  • AI-powered CoModeler assistant accelerates model development
  • Native dashboarding handles massive datasets beyond simple inventory tracking
  • High switching costs via deep POS/accounting integrations
  • B2B distribution hook through distributor catalog automation
  • Zero-cost pricing model lowers entry barrier for micro-businesses
  • Fiscal compliance tools provide essential regulatory utility
  • Local tax compliance alignment functions as a regulatory barrier to entry for international competitors
  • Lightweight interface lowers the barrier for small business adoption
  • Ecosystem network effects driven by Microsoft 365 integration
  • Industry-standard formatting tools for professional financial modeling
  • POS ecosystem integration creates high switching costs
  • Commission-free ordering serves as a primary acquisition hook
  • Integrated payment-to-volunteer workflow reduces on-site friction
  • Free utility model drives platform retention
-
  • Localized Czech accounting format support functions as a specific barrier to entry for international competitors.
  • ARES registry integration reduces manual data entry friction for local business users.
  • Manual entry model ensures data privacy by avoiding bank-login requirements
  • Focused feature set reduces cognitive load compared to full-scale ERP platforms
Weaknesses
  • Rigid model-driven architecture lacks the flexibility of unstructured tools
  • Mobile interface is restricted to existing enterprise subscribers
  • Limited vertical-specific functionality compared to niche competitors
  • Persistent mobile crashes during inventory counts
  • 2.88 average rating across platforms
  • Manual data entry friction
  • High-frequency login failures during registration
  • Infinite loading screens on launch
  • Session persistence issues forcing re-authentication
  • No offline functionality limits utility in low-connectivity environments
  • Reliance on existing web-account prevents standalone user acquisition
  • Premium-tier pricing above category median
  • Persistent configuration loops and crash reports post-update
  • Frequent session timeouts disrupt daily monitoring
  • Lack of biometric authentication increases user friction
  • 1.4★ Android-iOS rating gap on majority Android base
  • Lack of advanced CRM dashboard integration
-
  • Premium tier at 99 Kč/month lacks the fiscal document issuance capabilities found in active ERP competitors.
  • Zero rating count and lack of user reviews suggest low trust for financial data handling.
  • Manual data entry requirement creates high friction for new user onboarding
  • Lack of automated bank syncing limits value against fintech competitors
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreefreesubscriptionfreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceActiveZombieZombie-MaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence3 versions, ~9d avg2 versions, ~13d avg2 versions, ~2d avg2 versions, ~490d avg5 versions, ~12d avg2 versions, ~1653d avg2 versions, ~1d avg-1 versions1 versions

Compare Anaplan head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Anaplan, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0