be-charge vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against be-charge's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

be-charge
This App
ChargeLab
Nemesis
GARO Connect
Contender
Gridio
Peer
Easee
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperMove Soluções em EletromobilidadeChargeLabABB Chargedot Shanghai New Energy Technology Co., LtdGaro ABGridioEasee ASAMark HaleBerthXBCC Payments LLCRafael Machado
CategoryUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesProductivityNavigationUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesProductivity
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 53.4 / 51.0 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 53.3 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count017201310100
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 10, 2025May 26, 2021Nov 28, 2022Nov 23, 2022Aug 4, 2021Mar 23, 2020Mar 29, 2026Feb 12, 2022Apr 27, 2026Mar 20, 2025
Last UpdatedDec 10, 2025May 11, 2026Mar 13, 2026Mar 27, 2025Apr 30, 2026May 3, 2026May 1, 2026Feb 12, 2022Apr 27, 2026Mar 20, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment---negative-negative----
Score---25/100-35/100----
Praises---
  • Local network connectivity allows users to manage charging station settings directly without cloud dependency
-
  • Reliable charging performance and intuitive interface design for long-term daily electric vehicle users
----
Complaints---
  • Inability to add charging locations renders the application useless for daily electric vehicle management
  • Feature set advertised in the store description remains non-functional in the current application build
-
  • Unreliable scheduled charging functionality causes significant frustration when vehicles fail to charge overnight
----
Requests-----
  • Granular charging control features including percentage-based limits and specific duration settings for battery health
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • QR code-based station access provides a low-friction entry point for new users.
  • Station owner portal functions as a B2B distribution barrier into commercial partnerships.
  • Unified hardware-software management interface enables cross-device control
  • Free access model lowers the barrier to entry for residential hardware owners
  • Global industrial brand trust sustains enterprise-grade reliability
  • Native firmware upgrade paths provide exclusive hardware-software synergy
  • Local network connectivity enables direct hardware management without cloud dependency
  • Brand-agnostic API support enables rapid scaling across vehicle manufacturers
  • Automated cost-optimization algorithms deliver measurable financial ROI for users
  • Load balancing mechanism enables large-scale commercial installations by reducing infrastructure upgrade costs.
  • Cable locking feature reduces theft risk for public-facing chargers, reinforcing hardware reliability.
  • Kiosk Mode transforms consumer tablets into dedicated control panels
  • Smart Heat Prediction provides high-utility readiness metrics
  • Official DVF database integration provides a verifiable accuracy baseline
  • B2B referral model removes friction for casual user acquisition
  • Proprietary MIB hardware enables granular load-specific usage data
  • B2B subscription model creates recurring revenue per machine
  • Payment promise feature reduces immediate service-suspension churn
  • Subscription tiers bundled with streaming services increase average revenue per user
Weaknesses
  • Zero ratings across all platforms indicate a failure in the initial user acquisition funnel.
  • Lack of idling fee notifications limits utility for high-traffic station operators.
  • 1.03-star rating gap between iOS and Android platforms
  • Lack of enterprise-grade dynamic load management
  • No visible monetization strategy
  • 1.0 rating on iOS with only 2 reviews
  • Lack of automated idling fee notifications
  • Critical failure in charging location registration
  • 0-star rating average across 3 reviews
  • Lack of physical load-balancing capabilities limits utility in constrained residential grids
  • Software-only model lacks the stickiness of hardware-integrated ecosystems
  • Removal of historical charging logs in the latest update triggers data-visibility complaints.
  • Unreliable scheduled charging logic causes overnight charging failures for daily users.
  • $9.99/month subscription price exceeds free manufacturer apps
  • Hardware compatibility limited to Pentair systems
  • Zero-revenue consumer model limits reinvestment capacity
  • Lack of professional-grade 3D or AR tools restricts market share to casual users
  • Hardware-dependent onboarding limits rapid market penetration
  • Lack of multi-language support restricts reach in diverse demographics
  • Manual billing workflows create high friction
  • Lack of automated payment scheduling increases churn risk
  • No third-party API access
Pricingfreefreefreefreefreemiumfreesubscriptionfreesubscriptionsubscription
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceZombie
Update Cadence2 versions, ~2d avg2 versions, ~1d avg1 versions2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~13d avg2 versions, ~1d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo2 versions, ~67d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~0d avg2 versions, ~0d avg

Compare be-charge head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by be-charge, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0