Bluetooth Device Locator vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Bluetooth Device Locator's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

311 NYC
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperTapgodsZipoAppsMXHL Pte LtdCity of TorontoNexgen Asset ManagementCity of Dallas TXDi Nerd Apps LLCDacorie Smith
CategoryUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilitiesProductivityBusinessUtilitiesUtilitiesUtilities
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating3.3 / 54.5 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 51.9 / 52.1 / 50.0 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count319932911200
PriceUSD0.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateSep 9, 2020Apr 23, 2024Aug 17, 2015Jan 24, 2022Jul 19, 2025Sep 5, 2013Mar 5, 2026Aug 17, 2025
Last UpdatedDec 23, 2025Mar 8, 2026Apr 26, 2026Feb 17, 2026Jul 19, 2025Apr 27, 2026Mar 5, 2026Oct 20, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment--excellentterriblenegativeterrible--
Score--85/10020/10030/10020/100--
Praises--
  • Delivery agents provide reliable and punctual service that builds trust with frequent users
  • User interface design simplifies the booking process for both casual and business senders
  • The city service request platform provides a convenient digital alternative to traditional phone-based reporting channels
-
  • Reliable access to city services via phone support remains a positive touchpoint for residents
--
Complaints--
  • Customer support responsiveness remains a friction point for users seeking refunds or assistance
  • Persistent address entry failures prevent users from successfully submitting service requests across multiple device types
  • Data persistence issues force users to re-enter personal information for every single service request submission
  • Submission friction
  • Lack of transparency
  • Frequent application crashes and blank screens prevent users from submitting service requests post-update
  • Inaccurate map functionality and address validation errors block the reporting of city issues
  • Failure to upload images despite correct app permissions causes frustration for users reporting damage
--
Requests---
  • Integrated request history dashboard is needed to track status of past and current municipal service tickets
-
  • Improved reliability and stability for the core ticket submission workflow on mobile devices
--
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Simple interface focused on BLE discovery
  • Radar-based proximity interface provides immediate visual feedback for short-range recovery
  • Multi-device support consolidates tracking for Apple and third-party accessories
  • Location-based dispatching reduces fulfillment latency
  • API-driven e-commerce integrations lock in merchant volume
  • Automated insurance per parcel reduces seller risk
  • Broad 600-service catalog provides institutional utility
  • Integrated live agent support reduces call center volume
  • MyPlace address tool provides localized utility for garbage schedules.
  • Photo attachment capability enables higher-quality service request data.
  • Official municipal status provides a captive user base for city service reporting
  • One-tap submission flow reduces reporting friction
  • Interactive map provides immediate neighborhood context
  • Waste Transfer Notes function as a B2B distribution barrier into professional waste management firms.
  • WasteMap geographic visualization provides a clear utility for local recycling discovery.
Weaknesses
  • 3.3-star rating indicates poor user satisfaction
  • Lacks visual radar or map-based feedback
  • Manual scanning requirement creates high user effort
  • No background tracking or automated alerts for lost items
  • Customer support friction during refund requests
  • Profile management bugs causing data loss
  • Lack of self-service credit recovery
  • Persistent address entry crashes on submission
  • Lack of user profile data persistence
  • Photo upload navigation loops
  • 1.89-star iOS rating indicates severe friction in the core request flow.
  • Lack of push notifications for status updates limits user engagement.
  • 2.46 average rating across platforms
  • Critical crash loops during ticket submission
  • Map interface failures block core reporting
  • No historical resolution data limits user trust
  • Lacks multi-language support for diverse demographics
  • Manual logging requirement creates high friction for daily users.
  • No monetization model limits long-term development capacity.
Pricingpaidfreefreemiumfreefreefreefreefree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~204d avg1 versions1 versions2 versions, ~3d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~114d avg2 versions, ~3d avg1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~165d avg

Compare Bluetooth Device Locator head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Bluetooth Device Locator, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0