MARLVEL

BoardPAC for iPhone vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against BoardPAC for iPhone's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

BoardPAC for iPhone
This App
Industrious Office
Nemesis
Knotel
Contender
Bond Collective
Contender
Fintech Meetup
Contender
RBC Workplace
Contender
Konverse
Peer
Talkdesk Phone
Peer
HelloShift
Peer
Microsoft Teams
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperBOARDPAC PRIVATE LTDIndustrious National Management Company LLCNEWMARK & COMPANY REAL ESTATE, INC.Yardi Systems, Inc.Hyve Group PLCJohnson Controls, Inc.KonverseTalkdesk, Inc.HelloShift, Inc.Microsoft Corporation
CategoryBusinessBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivityProductivityBusinessBusiness
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSAndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating0.0 / 54.9 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 51.0 / 51.0 / 54.3 / 54.4 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count01,81512217723,356,480
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 3, 2021Jan 12, 2022Nov 27, 2024Nov 25, 2025Mar 16, 2026Mar 6, 2020Dec 19, 2016Nov 14, 2022Oct 31, 2015Nov 2, 2016
Last UpdatedMar 27, 2026May 13, 2026May 1, 2026Apr 18, 2026Mar 26, 2026Dec 26, 2025Jan 28, 2026May 21, 2024Apr 9, 2026May 7, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-----negative-mixednegative-
Score-----20/100-65/10030/100-
Praises--------
  • Internal communication and guest relations tools improve daily hotel operations for staff members
-
Complaints--------
  • Inability to access schedules or view photos prevents effective daily task management for users
  • Notification system lacks granular controls for specific departments or relevant task alerts
  • Account setup and application access failures block new users from starting their work
-
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Security certifications (ISO 27001, SOC type 2) function as a B2B procurement barrier
  • Specialized document-annotation tools for formal board governance
  • Secure archive structure tailored for legal record-keeping
  • Premium hospitality brand identity sustains member loyalty across 80+ cities
  • Digital key access functions as a high-friction switching cost for enterprise tenants
  • Referral program links B2B acquisition directly to member advocacy
  • White-label mobile interface reduces member friction
  • Lem AI Agent automates operator support workflows
  • Admin mobile app enables on-the-go ticketing
  • Hospitality-focused amenity management drives member retention
  • Frictionless booking interface reduces administrative overhead
-
  • Enterprise-grade facility management integration provides a stable B2B distribution channel
  • Frictionless access capability reduces physical entry friction for employees
-
  • Native contact center integration creates high switching costs
  • SIP-based hardware support secures legacy infrastructure
  • Enterprise-grade security satisfies regulated industry requirements
  • Familiar social-feed interface reduces staff training time
  • Native SMS guest communication provides a direct hospitality-specific engagement channel
  • Deep integration with Microsoft 365 creates high switching costs
  • Enterprise-grade security compliance sustains large-scale adoption
  • Global infrastructure supports massive user scalability
Weaknesses
  • No public self-serve pricing model
  • Infrequent update cadence compared to workspace competitors
  • Lack of physical meeting room hardware integration
  • Absence of granular facility-management ticketing systems
  • Lack of occupancy analytics for enterprise facility managers
  • Android-iOS rating gap (4.87 vs 4.94) suggests platform-specific UX friction
  • No facility maintenance ticketing system
  • Lacks granular indoor navigation tools
  • Demo-led sales funnel slows entry-level adoption
  • Cloud-dependent architecture lacks offline-first reliability
  • Limited community networking restricts app to transactional utility
-
  • 1.0-star rating indicates severe usability or deployment failure
  • Lack of social or productivity features limits daily active usage
-
  • Gated licensing model restricts top-of-funnel growth
  • 0.76-star rating gap between iOS and Android
  • Lack of channel-based collaboration reduces daily usage
  • High-frequency registration failures block new user onboarding
  • Lack of granular notification controls causes information overload
  • Missing visual data in the interface prevents effective task management
  • High-volume notification culture drives user fatigue
  • Feature bloat increases complexity for non-desk workers
  • 60-minute meeting limit on free tier restricts utility
Pricingpaidfreemiumsubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreefreesubscriptionfreefreemium
MomentumMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceMaintenance---MaintenanceMaintenanceActive
Update Cadence1 versions3 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~7d avg2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, ~22d avg---2 versions, ~493d avg2 versions, ~11d avg5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~7d avg

Compare BoardPAC for iPhone head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by BoardPAC for iPhone, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0