FGTS | Saque e Calendário 2026 vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against FGTS | Saque e Calendário 2026's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperFacilita - MobappsApplorium LtdGrow Nest Egg, LLCJavid MultaniKavita GabaniWebtowebPolymarketWebull Technologies Pte. Ltd.KalshiEX LLCFidelity Investments
CategoryToolsFinanceFinanceProductivityFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceFinance
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.7 / 53.7 / 50.0 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count3,266,85514,26661026,35741,496337,124265,7813,190,745
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 30, 2016Jan 23, 2015Jul 29, 2018Jul 31, 2024Feb 21, 2022Apr 23, 2020Sep 24, 2024Jan 18, 2017Sep 16, 2022Feb 22, 2010
Last UpdatedMay 13, 2026Feb 25, 2026Mar 11, 2024Jul 31, 2024Oct 14, 2025Jan 5, 2026Jun 30, 2026Jun 22, 2026Jun 29, 2026Jun 25, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterrible---mixed----mixed
Score15/100---75/100----65/100
Praises
  • Early adopters found the initial release experience efficient and practical for basic tasks
---
  • SIP and financial planning calculators provide high utility for personal savings management
-----
Complaints
  • Users frequently report the application is a fraudulent service that fails to display balances
---
  • Excessive advertisement frequency disrupts the user experience during financial planning tasks
-----
Requests
  • Users demand a functional digital channel for managing government benefits without requiring physical branch visits
---
  • Flexible subscription options for shorter durations are requested by users
-----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Simplified UX for anniversary withdrawal simulation [Market Segment]
  • Broad 40-tool utility suite sustains organic discovery velocity
  • Clean interface reduces cognitive load compared to ad-heavy rivals
  • Specialized tax-advantaged logic builds category trust
  • Persistent input storage reduces friction for recurring check-ins
-
  • Niche-specific interface reduces cognitive load for SIP investors
  • PDF export mechanism facilitates viral user acquisition
  • PDF report generation functions as a viral sharing mechanism for financial advisors
  • Advanced simulation mode enables multi-deposit modeling that standard calculators lack
  • CFTC-regulated status functions as a B2B distribution barrier into US financial partnerships
  • High-frequency trading UX enables faster in-game sports betting than traditional sportsbook interfaces
  • Vega AI market synthesis drives active trader retention
  • Extended-hours trading access captures high-volatility volume
  • Commission-free structure lowers the barrier for retail entry
  • CFTC-regulated status builds institutional trust
  • Python API enables automated strategy development
  • Institutional-grade research tools provide higher reliability for long-term investors
  • All-in-one ecosystem integrates banking, retirement, and crypto services
Weaknesses
  • 0.28★ rating gap between iOS and Android [Platform Metric]
  • High frequency of scam labels in reviews [Sentiment Data]
  • Subscription model creates friction for casual users
  • Lack of offline-first architecture limits utility in high-stakes environments
  • Manual data entry creates high user friction
  • No real-time account syncing limits utility
  • 3.68 rating indicates significant user frustration
-
  • High ad density disrupts core planning tasks
  • Subscription payment failures drive user distrust and churn
  • Ad-supported revenue model creates friction during high-intent simulation sessions
  • Lack of institutional banking integration limits trust compared to bank-owned utilities
  • Android rating (3.09) trails iOS (4.64) by a significant margin
  • Lack of daily-use habit loops limits retention outside of major news cycles
  • Premium tier subscription requirement for IRA matching
  • Lack of integrated banking services
  • Reliance on order flow revenue
  • High-friction onboarding vs crypto-native rivals
  • Lacks daily-use lifestyle integration
  • Mobile interface lacks high-performance design for rapid day trading
  • Complexity of research tools creates friction for novice mobile users
Pricingfreesubscriptionfreefreefreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreefreemium
MomentumMaintenanceActiveZombie-MaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseActiveIntenseActive
Update Cadence5 versions, ~42d avg5 versions5 versions-2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~128d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~57d avg5 versions, ~4d avg5 versions, ~9d avg5 versions, ~1d avg5 versions, ~5d avg

Compare FGTS | Saque e Calendário 2026 head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by FGTS | Saque e Calendário 2026, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0