High confidence · Latest 72 of 111 total reviews analyzed · Based on 111 reviews. Signal may be noisy.

Frustrated

Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate ai-driven food logging provides a convenient way to track daily nutritional intake without manual entry, but report account access failures and password reset malfunctions prevent users from logging into their purchased subscriptions and inaccurate nutritional calculations and ai recognition errors undermine the reliability of the calorie tracking data.

Rating: 4.6

Reviews: 111

Confidence: high

How did the latest release land?

Overall
4.6/ 5
(20K)
Current version
4.7/ 5
+0.1 vs overall
(1.7K)
Main signal post-update: aI-driven food logging provides a convenient way to track daily nutritional intake without manual entry.

Sentiment over time

Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.

How have ratings & review volume moved?

Rating, review sentiment, and total reviews over time, with release markers showing the post-launch impact.

Rating over time

Vertical markers = app releases. Hover any release for the post-release impact delta.

Releases:MajorMinorPatch3 releases in range

Review themes

Praise

What users love

  • AI-driven food logging provides a convenient way to track daily nutritional intake without manual entry
    • Users appreciate the ability to photograph meals for automatic calorie and nutrient analysis
    • The automated logging feature is described as a significant time-saver for daily tracking
Complaint

Common complaints

  • Account access failures and password reset malfunctions prevent users from logging into their purchased subscriptions
    • Multiple reports of users being signed out and unable to receive password recovery emails
    • Users who changed devices report being unable to restore their lifetime access
  • Inaccurate nutritional calculations and AI recognition errors undermine the reliability of the calorie tracking data
    • Users report significant discrepancies between actual food labels and the AI-generated calorie or macro counts
    • The scanner frequently fails to recognize common food items or provides incorrect nutritional breakdowns
Request

Most requested

  • Improved customer support responsiveness for resolving billing disputes and account recovery issues
    • Users express frustration over ignored emails regarding subscription restoration and refund requests
    • Lack of a clear contact channel for developers is a recurring point of friction

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by AI Calorie Tracker by Eatwise, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0