ClockShark vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against ClockShark's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

ClockShark
This App
Lumiform
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperClockShark, LLCTimesheet Mobile™Genyo - Gestão InteligenteBoston Billing Solutions, LLCLumiformArcoro Holdings Corp.Nicole CatJatisari Inovasi StudioYunaSoft Inc.Direct Cursus Computer Systems Trading LLC
CategoryBusinessBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivityBusinessProductivityProductivityProductivityProductivity
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSAndroidiOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating2.9 / 54.4 / 53.0 / 54.5 / 54.4 / 52.8 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 53.6 / 53.4 / 5
Ratings Count2682,13021,708192661054621,437243
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree$0.49FreeFreeFree
Release DateJul 25, 2014Oct 26, 2012Oct 17, 2023Oct 6, 2011Oct 2, 2020May 22, 2010Nov 16, 2023May 18, 2022Nov 5, 2014Mar 5, 2025
Last UpdatedApr 18, 2024Sep 13, 2024Apr 23, 2026Aug 29, 2024May 6, 2026Apr 23, 2026Apr 13, 2026Apr 6, 2026Apr 11, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixednegative-mixed-mixed--negative-
Score50/10025/100-65/100-55/100--25/100-
Praises-
  • Core time tracking functionality provides a digital alternative to paper-based timesheets for field employees
-
  • Reliable cloud-sync during connectivity drops
-
  • Reliability of offline data syncing in remote job sites
--
  • Visual calendar widget design provides a clear overview of daily schedules for long-term users
-
Complaints-
  • Mandatory background location tracking drains device battery and raises significant privacy concerns for employees
  • Frequent application freezes and synchronization errors disrupt the daily punch-in and punch-out workflow
-
  • Android UI stability issues
-
  • UI/UX friction and difficulty navigating the clock-in workflow
--
  • Aggressive full-screen advertisements interrupt core scheduling workflows and frustrate long-term paying users
  • Critical data loss events erase years of saved calendar entries without user intervention
-
Requests-
  • Granular location permission settings to allow tracking only while the application is in use
------
  • One-time purchase option to remove advertisements instead of recurring subscription models
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • GPS breadcrumb trails provide audit-ready payroll data
  • CrewClock reduces hardware overhead for field teams
  • QuickBooks integration reduces administrative friction for accounting departments
  • Geofence automation creates a high-utility hook for field-service management
  • 10-minute configuration flow lowers SMB adoption friction
  • AI-driven inconsistency analysis reduces HR payroll audit labor
  • Offline-first architecture supports field-staff reliability
  • Cloud-sync mechanism ensures data integrity during connectivity drops
  • Deep accounting integrations automate payroll workflows for professional service firms
  • No-code form builder enables rapid deployment for non-technical operations managers.
  • Offline-first architecture ensures data continuity for remote field teams.
  • Offline data caching functions as a B2B distribution barrier in remote construction sites
  • FaceFront Biometrics prevents buddy punching, satisfying payroll compliance requirements
  • Feline-themed gamification creates a unique emotional hook for casual users
  • Minimalist UX reduces friction for non-professional productivity needs
-
  • High-density widget layouts provide faster glanceable access than full-featured competitors
  • Regional lunar calendar support secures niche user segments
-
Weaknesses
  • 2.9★ iOS rating indicates persistent stability issues
  • Lack of native biometric verification limits security appeal
  • Mandatory background location tracking triggers privacy complaints
  • Synchronization errors disrupt daily punch-in workflows
  • Limited user feedback loop hinders UX refinement
  • Manual regional holiday configuration increases administrative burden
  • Low public review count limits social proof
  • 1.12★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates poor cross-platform parity
  • Manual time-entry model lacks biometric fraud prevention
  • Lack of biometric verification limits trust for time-sensitive labor data.
  • Absence of integrated job costing reduces ROI for professional services.
  • 2.8★ iOS rating indicates significant UI/UX friction
  • Requirement for separate cloud subscription creates high acquisition friction
  • One-time $0.49 purchase model limits recurring revenue for development
  • Lack of cloud-sync capabilities compared to professional-grade competitors
-
  • Unskippable full-screen ads interrupt core scheduling workflows
  • Critical data loss events after OS updates
  • Widget rendering failures on modern operating systems
-
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemiumfreemiumpaidfreesubscriptionfree
MomentumMaintenanceZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-Intense-
Update Cadence2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~746d avg1 versions2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~16d avg2 versions, ~35d avg2 versions, ~2d avg2 versions, ~1d avg1 versions-5 versions-

Compare ClockShark head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by ClockShark, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0