Tatame vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Tatame's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Tatame
This App
Wodify
Nemesis
Glofox
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperPaulo Cavalcante de OliveiraWodifyDaxko LLCGlofoxVirtuagym B.V.Spark Membership LLC
CategoryBusinessHealth & FitnessBusinessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.9 / 54.6 / 54.5 / 54.8 / 53.7 / 5
Ratings Count215,3917,1102217,958343
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateMar 18, 2026Apr 27, 2021Jan 9, 2016Sep 15, 2014Mar 21, 2014Feb 19, 2019
Last UpdatedApr 25, 2026Feb 25, 2026Oct 15, 2025May 6, 2026Apr 5, 2026Mar 30, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentexcellentmixed---mixed
Score90/10065/100---50/100
Praises
  • Comprehensive management tools for Brazilian Jiu Jitsu academy operations provide significant administrative value
  • Convenience of class scheduling and performance tracking
---
  • Utility for class scheduling and attendance tracking
Complaints-
  • Android instability compared to iOS
---
  • Navigation friction and inconsistent UI performance
Requests------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • BJJ-specific belt tracking creates high switching costs
  • Administrative automation replaces manual paper-based workflows
  • 24/7 access control integration functions as a mandatory utility moat for gym members
  • Branded app capabilities provide a B2B distribution barrier into boutique gym partnerships
-
  • Integrated payment processing reduces friction for recurring membership revenue
  • B2B distribution model creates high switching costs for partner studios
-
  • Specialized martial arts curriculum tracking creates high switching costs for studio owners.
  • Deep integration with physical school attendance records anchors daily usage.
Weaknesses
  • Zero revenue model limits sustainability
  • Lack of automated billing prevents full business utility
  • 1.4★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates poor platform parity
  • Lack of native wearable integration limits hands-free logging during workouts
-
  • Premium tier pricing is absent, limiting direct-to-consumer revenue
  • 0.26★ Android-iOS rating gap suggests inconsistent performance on the larger Android user base
-
  • 3.53 rating on Android indicates persistent UI friction.
  • Lack of high-velocity feature updates slows engagement growth.
Pricingfreesubscriptionfreefreefreemiumfree
MomentumIntenseMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceIntenseMaintenance
Update Cadence5 versions2 versions, ~0d avg5 versions2 versions, ~1d avg5 versions2 versions, ~44d avg

Compare Tatame head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Tatame, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0