Spades * vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Spades *'s closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Spades *
This App
Blackjack
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperFiogonia GamesTripledot StudiosTripledot StudiosTripledot StudiosTripledot StudiosPUMPKIN VN CO., LTDCHEELY APPS (CHILI APPS), TOOBeach Bum LtdAged Studio LimitedSuperPlay
CategoryGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesGamesCardGamesGamesGames
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 53.8 / 54.3 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.9 / 5
Ratings Count424,807864,5048,192307,36889,7841370,12569,23264,573628,543
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateNov 30, 2017Dec 11, 2017Aug 4, 2018Aug 30, 2019Aug 25, 2024Apr 11, 2022Oct 9, 2017Jan 14, 2020Jul 14, 2022Apr 17, 2025
Last UpdatedApr 14, 2026May 19, 2026Jan 4, 2021Jun 23, 2026Jun 17, 2026Apr 2, 2025May 8, 2026Mar 5, 2026Apr 1, 2026Jun 27, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentnegativepositive--positive--mixedexcellentmixed
Score35/10085/100--85/100--65/10085/10055/100
Praises
  • Simple card mechanics provide an accessible and enjoyable pastime for casual players
  • Relaxing offline experience
--
  • Smooth and intuitive interface
--
  • Core card game mechanics provide an engaging and fun experience for casual players
  • Relaxing gameplay loop provides a reliable mental break for users during daily downtime
  • Nostalgic Disney character integration provides a refreshing aesthetic for casual solitaire card play
  • Fast-paced card mechanics allow for quick sessions during short breaks throughout the day
Complaints
  • Aggressive ad frequency and intrusive ad content disrupt the core gameplay experience
  • Ad frequency
--
  • Intrusive advertising
--
  • Aggressive monetization pressure forces players to purchase coins to continue playing matches
  • Increasing frequency of intrusive advertisements disrupts the relaxing flow of the game
  • Aggressive monetization pressure forces players to purchase coins to progress through higher levels
  • Excessive pop-up advertisements and event notifications disrupt the core gameplay experience upon launch
  • Unfair card distribution logic makes specific levels impossible to clear without using expensive power-ups
Requests
  • Quality of life improvements for menu navigation and game statistics access
  • Meta-game features
------
  • Clearer utility for accumulated in-game stars to provide meaningful progression rewards
  • Improved reward balance for daily logins and level completion to reduce reliance on purchases
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Adaptive AI difficulty scaling maintains challenge levels
  • Offline-first architecture supports high-frequency casual play
  • Offline-first architecture sustains engagement in low-connectivity markets
  • High-frequency daily puzzles drive consistent daily active habit
  • Faithful Windows 95 aesthetic drives high user resonance among nostalgia-seeking segments.
  • No-registration access reduces funnel friction
  • Offline-first architecture ensures session continuity
  • Customizable rule-sets provide authentic casino feel
  • Offline-capable gameplay loop sustains retention
  • Intuitive UI lowers entry barriers for casuals
  • Consistent update cadence maintains core stability
-
  • Real-time PvP arena provides high-stakes engagement.
  • Clan-based territory wars drive social retention.
  • High-fidelity UI design sustains organic install velocity
  • Multiplayer-first architecture drives social network effects
  • Multi-variant rule support captures niche card-game purists
  • 4-in-one suite provides a distraction-free experience for classic purists
  • Daily challenges maintain a consistent loop of returning users
  • Lightweight package minimizes device storage friction
  • High-fidelity Disney IP drives emotional engagement
  • Visual production value creates a premium experience
Weaknesses
  • Aggressive ad frequency triggers negative sentiment
  • AI partner logic frequently sabotages team matches
  • Technical bugs block game interface
  • Ad-only monetization model limits revenue per user
  • Lack of meta-progression causes churn among power users
  • No ad-free purchase option despite high-volume ad-supported monetization model.
  • Lack of social tournament leaderboards
  • Ad-heavy monetization creates churn risk
  • No persistent meta-progression system
  • Ad-only monetization limits revenue per user
  • Lack of social meta-progression reduces stickiness
  • No IAP gates to capture power-user value
-
  • Lack of cloud-save functionality.
  • Monetization model lacks clear value tiers.
  • Coin-economy tuning forces purchases, driving negative sentiment
  • Perceived matchmaking bias erodes trust in competitive fairness
  • Ad frequency disrupts the core gameplay loop
  • Intrusive ad frequency disrupts the relaxing gameplay loop
  • Lack of star-point utility creates a dead-end progression loop
  • Premium subscription pricing is high compared to one-time-purchase alternatives
  • Aggressive monetization pressure forces IAP spending
  • Unfair card distribution logic creates artificial difficulty spikes
Pricingfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieActiveMaintenance--MaintenanceIntenseActive
Update Cadence5 versions, ~56d avg5 versions, ~40d avg5 versions, 4 majors/6mo, ~206d avg5 versions, ~11d avg5 versions, ~14d avg--5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~6d avg

Compare Spades * head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Spades *, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0