Leaderboard by IBD vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Leaderboard by IBD's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperInvestor’s Business Daily, Inc.Dow Jones & Company, Inc., publisher of The Wall Street Journal.Acorns Grow IncorporatedMetaQuotes Software Corp.The Charles Schwab CorporationKikoff Inc.Brigit Inc
CategoryFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceFinanceFinance
PlatformiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count5,284234,131950,22772,9231,150,013238,129490,571
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJun 5, 2019Nov 2, 2009Aug 26, 2014Jan 15, 2011Dec 14, 2010Apr 14, 2021Apr 22, 2018
Last UpdatedMay 8, 2026Mar 25, 2026May 4, 2026Apr 29, 2026Apr 30, 2026Apr 10, 2026May 18, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixed-mixedexcellentterrible-mixed
Score45/100-45/10085/10025/100-45/100
Praises
  • Growth trading methodology provides actionable stock picks and clear technical chart patterns for investors
-
  • Automated round-up investing provides a painless way for beginners to build long-term savings habits
  • Fast trade execution and reliable withdrawal processing drive high user trust in the platform
  • Helpful customer service representatives provide effective guidance for new investors navigating the platform
-
  • Instant cash access provides critical financial relief for users facing unexpected emergency expenses
Complaints
  • Push notifications fail to trigger for buy and sell alerts on Android devices
-
  • Subscription billing continues after account closure attempts, leading to accusations of predatory financial practices
  • Discrepancies in chart visualization compared to legacy trading platforms cause confusion for migrating users
  • Persistent login failures and authentication loops block access to accounts following recent updates
-
  • Technical failures during bank account linking prevent users from accessing promised cash advance services
Requests
  • Enhanced chart interactivity including crosshair tools for precise price and date reading
-
  • Visual separation between checking and investment balances to help users maintain a set-and-forget mindset
  • Integration of advanced market analysis tools similar to external charting platforms
  • Integration of realized gains and loss reporting directly within the mobile interface
-
  • Improved access to human customer support representatives to resolve complex account and billing issues
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • 1-on-1 coaching functions as a high-touch retention barrier against lower-cost research apps
  • Proprietary trading plans provide a clear value-add over raw data aggregators
-
  • Round-Ups mechanism creates daily retention
  • Acorns Early accounts increase household switching costs
  • Automated ETF portfolios simplify entry for novices
  • High-performance execution engine sustains professional trust
  • MQL5 algorithmic environment creates high switching costs
  • Deep broker-server integration ensures platform ubiquity
  • Integrated banking-brokerage bundle creates high switching costs
  • thinkorswim tools provide professional-grade differentiation
  • Zero-commission model sustains organic install velocity
  • Automated tradeline reporting creates synthetic payment history
  • $5/month entry tier lowers acquisition friction
  • High iOS rating (4.9) indicates strong satisfaction
  • Automated overdraft prediction reduces bank fees, creating high switching costs
  • 12M+ user base provides data for credit-risk modeling
Weaknesses
  • $69.99/month price point exceeds the median for individual investor research tools
  • Persistent Android notification failures erode the core utility of time-sensitive trading alerts
-
  • Recurring billing issues post-cancellation
  • Account locking and verification loops
  • $12/month Gold tier price above category median
  • Legacy interface design creates friction for new users
  • Account setup process for demo environments lacks accessibility
  • Limited native social-community features compared to modern alternatives
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates platform-specific instability
  • Authentication loops block core trading access
  • Missing tax-lot reporting reduces utility for power users
  • Subscription model creates churn risk post-credit improvement
  • Lacks broad financial utility of banking competitors
  • Reliance on third-party bureaus for score impact
  • Recurring bank-linking errors prevent service access
  • Lack of human support for billing disputes drives negative sentiment
  • Premium tier pricing above category median
Pricingsubscriptionfreesubscriptionfreefreesubscriptionfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceIntenseActiveActiveSteadyIntenseActive
Update Cadence5 versions, ~13d avg5 versions5 versions, ~7d avg5 versions, ~12d avg5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~22d avg5 versions5 versions, 3 majors/6mo, ~9d avg

Compare Leaderboard by IBD head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Leaderboard by IBD, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0