Templates for Pages (Nobody) vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Templates for Pages (Nobody)'s closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperTill-Eugen KoenitzerGraphic NodeMicrosoft CorporationReaddle Technologies Limited
CategoryProductivityProductivityProductivityProductivity
PlatformiOSiOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.6 / 54.5 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 5
Ratings Count1,2421192,836,204614,518
PriceUSD1.99FreeFreeFree
Release DateJun 14, 2011Jun 29, 2011Mar 27, 2014Apr 1, 2010
Last UpdatedDec 6, 2023May 12, 2026May 4, 2026Apr 14, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentexcellent-mixedpositive
Score88/100-45/10078/100
Praises
  • Extensive template variety provides professional document design options for business and personal projects
-
  • Mobile document editing functionality provides significant utility for academic and professional tasks on the go
  • Core document creation and management features remain reliable for long-term users across multiple devices
  • Ease of Use and Interface
  • Cross-Platform/Device Utility
Complaints
  • Outdated calendar content in the latest update frustrates users seeking current year planning tools
-
  • Keyboard input failures following the latest update prevent users from typing or editing documents on mobile
  • Data loss and synchronization errors result in the permanent disappearance of hours of user work
  • Aggressive Monetization
  • Performance and Stability Issues
Requests
  • Expansion of the template library to include business plans and recipe document formats
-
  • Restoration of original male and female voices for the read aloud feature to replace mechanical options
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Professional design quality sustains high value-to-cost ratio
  • Broad paper-size support increases utility for diverse professional use cases
  • Monthly template update cadence sustains long-term subscription value
  • Deep integration with Apple Pages provides a frictionless workflow
  • Professional-grade typography and layout engine
  • Deep integration with local file systems
  • Established brand trust for long-form documentation
  • Modern and intuitive UI/UX compared to legacy competitors
  • Advanced AI integration (transcription, smart eraser)
  • Massive social proof with 2.2M+ ratings
Weaknesses
  • Outdated calendar content in the latest release erodes trust
  • Lack of instructional guidance creates friction for new users
  • Subscription gate at 3 days creates high initial friction
  • Lack of cross-platform export formats limits utility
  • Keyboard input regressions in the latest release
  • High barrier to entry for full editing features
  • Sync-related data loss reports
  • User friction from aggressive subscription paywalls
  • Performance regressions (crashing, overheating) in recent updates
  • Lack of granular network protocol depth compared to GoodReader
Pricingpaidsubscriptionsubscriptionfreemium
MomentumZombieMaintenanceActiveActive
Update Cadence5 versions1 versions5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~10d avg5 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~7d avg

Compare Templates for Pages (Nobody) head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Templates for Pages (Nobody), its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0