MARLVEL

Rover—Dog Sitters & Walkers vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Rover—Dog Sitters & Walkers's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Rover—Dog Sitters & Walkers
This App
Wag! - Dog Walkers & Sitters
Nemesis
Meowtel: In-Home Cat Sitting
Contender
TrustedHousesitters
Contender
Nextdoor: Neighborhood Network
Peer
Time To Pet
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperRover.comWag Labs, Inc.Meowtel Inc.TrustedHousesitters LtdNextdoorSweet Spearmint Software, LLC
CategoryTravelTravelTravelTravelNewsBusiness
PlatformiOSAndroid, iOSAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.9 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.8 / 54.7 / 54.3 / 5
Ratings Count515,35962,8923,97214,4702,066,112227
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 9, 2012Dec 23, 2014Jul 19, 2020Aug 4, 2018May 23, 2013Jan 28, 2015
Last UpdatedApr 22, 2026Apr 10, 2026Apr 28, 2026Apr 27, 2026May 6, 2026Apr 26, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterrible---terrible-
Score15/100---15/100-
Praises
  • Flexible scheduling options allow sitters to manage their own availability and time off
---
  • Neighborhood connectivity features provide helpful local information for finding jobs and community events
-
Complaints
  • Automated support responses and AI-generated replies fail to resolve complex account issues
  • Mandatory background check fees create a high barrier to entry for new sitters
---
  • Aggressive email and notification spam persists even after users manually disable all alert settings
  • Overzealous moderation and account suspension policies alienate users who express dissenting or conservative viewpoints
-
Requests
  • Granular availability settings would allow sitters to block specific hours within a day
---
  • Granular filtering controls for neighborhood content to exclude posts from outside the immediate area
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Rover Guarantee reduces user risk perception
  • GPS tracking provides verifiable proof of service
  • In-app messaging keeps transaction lifecycle on-platform
---
  • Address-verified network creates a high-trust environment for local advertising
  • 1,720+ publisher network provides utility-driven daily active usage
-
Weaknesses
  • 15/100 sentiment score indicates severe trust deficit
  • Automated support fails to resolve account bans
  • Background check fees discourage new sitter supply
---
  • Notification opt-out logic fails to stop email spam
  • High ad density degrades usability in the marketplace and feed
-
Pricingfreemiumfreefreesubscriptionfreefree
MomentumActiveIntenseIntenseIntenseActiveIntense
Update Cadence2 versions, ~11d avg5 versions5 versions5 versions5 versions, ~8d avg5 versions

Compare Rover—Dog Sitters & Walkers head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Rover—Dog Sitters & Walkers, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0