Dott (previously TIER) vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Dott (previously TIER)'s closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Core Identity
DeveloperDott B.V.Blue Jay Transit Inc.Pheenix USH LLCBOLT TECHNOLOGY OUIntelligent Apps GmbHCitymapper LimitedBeryl
CategoryTravelTravelTravelTravelTravelNavigationTravel
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidAndroid, iOSiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.9 / 54.7 / 54.8 / 54.8 / 54.9 / 54.3 / 5
Ratings Count8,1521,487,716485,181171,70250,536102,16253
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJan 28, 2019Sep 11, 2017Jun 21, 2017Jul 24, 2013May 17, 2011Oct 18, 2011Nov 14, 2018
Last UpdatedMay 6, 2026Apr 14, 2026May 18, 2026May 18, 2026May 13, 2026May 13, 2026Mar 30, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterriblenegativeterriblenegativemixedpositive-
Score15/10038/10015/10025/10045/10078/100-
Praises
  • Core ride functionality provides efficient and fast transport for short urban commutes
  • Fun and Enjoyment
  • Convenience
  • Fast and convenient scooter transit provides an enjoyable alternative to walking for short urban trips
  • Polite and friendly driver interactions create a positive experience for many passengers
  • Professional and courteous driver interactions during trips create a positive experience for passengers
  • Real-time transit navigation provides accurate route planning across complex international city networks
-
Complaints
  • Automated support bots fail to resolve billing disputes and technical errors post-update
  • Inaccurate parking zone detection leads to unfair fines and inability to end rides
  • Billing and Overcharging
  • Inability to End Rides
  • Geofencing errors prevent users from ending rides in designated parking zones causing significant overcharging
  • Inaccessible customer support fails to provide adequate refunds for technical failures and app glitches
  • Inaccurate wait time estimates and driver cancellations cause significant passenger frustration
  • Inaccurate fare calculations and unexpected charges create significant distrust in the payment system
  • Inaccurate bus arrival times and missing diversion data lead to missed connections post-update
-
Requests
  • Integration of standard map navigation to help users locate available scooters more easily
-
  • Transparent pricing models per hour would improve perceived value compared to current per-minute rates
  • In-app tipping functionality requested to support drivers without using cash
  • Simplified cancellation flow to prevent accidental charges for incorrect pickup locations
  • Customizable walking speed settings to improve route accuracy for users with different mobility needs
-
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • 400+ city footprint enables broad regional network effects
  • Hybrid subscription passes lock in recurring commuter revenue
  • Global scale (350+ cities)
  • Group Rides multi-vehicle feature
  • High brand recognition and rating volume
  • Camera-based computer vision secures municipal operating licenses
  • Remote repositioning maximizes fleet availability
  • Physical hub infrastructure increases brand visibility
  • Multi-modal interface captures short and long-distance transit needs
  • Safety toolkit reduces churn by lowering perceived risk
  • Global footprint enables rapid market entry
  • Localized taxi-first brand identity sustains trust
  • Multi-modal aggregation increases session frequency
  • B2B mobility benefits lock in corporate volume
  • Transit-first UX reduces cognitive load compared to general-purpose map interfaces.
  • Multimodal integration aggregates disparate transit agencies into a single, unified navigation flow.
-
Weaknesses
  • AI support loops drive high churn
  • Parking zone detection errors trigger frequent billing disputes
  • Technical instability prevents vehicle activation
  • Critical failures in end-ride geofencing
  • Opaque auto-reload billing practices
  • Lower update frequency than top-tier rivals
  • High-frequency geofencing errors cause billing disputes
  • Support responsiveness is insufficient for technical failures
  • Connectivity issues prevent vehicle activation
  • Unresponsive support for billing disputes
  • Inaccurate arrival time estimates
  • Opaque fare fluctuations erode user trust
  • Automated support fails to resolve billing disputes
  • Fare estimate inaccuracies erode user trust
  • Cancellation flows are difficult to navigate
  • Inaccurate bus arrival predictions post-update trigger high-frequency churn among daily commuters.
  • Navigation crashes during route initiation erode the core utility of the GO navigation feature.
-
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreefreemiumfreemium
MomentumActiveMaintenanceActiveActiveActiveActiveIntense
Update Cadence5 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~6d avg5 versions, ~7d avg5 versions, ~10d avg5 versions, ~10d avg5 versions, ~10d avg5 versions, 5 majors/6mo, ~13d avg5 versions

Compare Dott (previously TIER) head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Dott (previously TIER), its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0