MARLVEL

EyeQue PDCheck vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against EyeQue PDCheck's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

EyeQue PDCheck
This App
Eye Test & Vision Checker
Peer
Simple Vision & Color Test
Peer
iVisionTester
Peer
Vision Check by Optikos Prime
Peer
Color Blindness Test Ishihara
Peer
SkinSort - Skincare Scanner
Peer
SkinJoy: AI Cosmetic Scanner
Peer
vision.app
New Kid
Eye Measure – PD Ruler
New Kid
Core Identity
DeveloperEyeQue CorporationMobimartech SARLBROKERSNicholas WilsonOptikosPrime ApSRina KatrinaSkinSortSEAMOBI TECH PTE LTDCapital Certainty SLRamkumar Vellaisamy
CategoryHealth & FitnessProductivityMedicalMedicalHealth & FitnessMedicalHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessMedical
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidAndroidiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating3.7 / 53.5 / 54.3 / 51.0 / 55.0 / 53.0 / 54.7 / 54.7 / 50.0 / 54.0 / 5
Ratings Count1333381115,01651701
PriceFreeFreeFree$0.99FreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 8, 2019Aug 12, 2024Jan 23, 2022Oct 21, 2011Sep 5, 2024Aug 15, 2020Jun 24, 2024Jan 2, 2025Feb 16, 2026Feb 27, 2026
Last UpdatedAug 1, 2022Mar 22, 2026Sep 23, 2024May 9, 2026Apr 1, 2026Apr 21, 2025May 11, 2026Apr 30, 2025Mar 27, 2026Feb 27, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentterriblemixed----positivemixed--
Score15/10055/100----85/10055/100--
Praises
  • Accurate pupillary distance measurements provide a cost-effective alternative to professional optometrist visits for users
  • Convenient at-home vision checks provide quick accessibility for monitoring eye health between professional appointments
----
  • Ingredient transparency and scientific research backing
  • AI-driven skin analysis provides accurate identification of specific skin conditions and concerns
  • Ingredient database helps users verify product safety and identify potential skin irritants
--
Complaints
  • Mandatory account registration and login failures prevent users from accessing the core measurement functionality
  • Facial recognition and eye tracking failures prevent successful completion of the measurement process
  • AI-generated test content produces distorted or illegible characters that render the vision assessment completely useless
----
  • Scanning errors and database coverage gaps
  • Aggressive monetization tactics force payments for basic health and skincare analysis features
  • Excessive advertisement frequency disrupts the user experience during routine navigation
  • Technical failures during product scanning prevent users from accessing core analysis functionality
--
Requests----------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Clinical-grade accuracy in PD measurement sustains brand authority
  • Proprietary hardware-to-app conversion loop captures high-intent eyewear buyers
  • Vision improvement exercises create a daily retention loop for users seeking eye strain relief.
--
  • Optician-gated access ensures clinical trust and professional oversight
  • High-precision measurement capability on specific iPhone camera hardware
  • Professional screening mode provides specialized clinical utility
  • Free-to-use model removes friction for initial acquisition
  • Independent data sourcing prevents brand influence
  • Scientific research backing builds user trust
  • Specialized AI-driven cosmetic analysis provides higher personalization than generalist scanners
  • User-defined allergy filters create high-intent retention
  • Voice-recognition distance testing simplifies the screening workflow
  • Web-based demo lowers the barrier for new user acquisition
-
Weaknesses
  • 0.7★ Android-iOS rating gap indicates poor platform-specific stability
  • Mandatory account registration creates a high-friction barrier to entry
  • AI-generated test targets are frequently illegible, causing high churn post-download.
--
  • Zero direct-to-consumer diagnostic value without optician authorization
  • Hardware-locked precision features limit the addressable user base
  • Static testing utility lacks daily-use retention loops
  • No monetization strategy limits development capacity
  • Zero Android rating count indicates poor visibility
  • Manual scanning friction limits daily usage
  • Lack of automated AI consultation
  • 5-scan weekly limit triggers high-frequency monetization complaints
  • Technical scan failures erode user trust
  • Excessive ad density disrupts core utility
  • Zero clinical validation limits trust with health-conscious users
  • No pupillary distance measurement tool compared to EyeQue
-
Pricingfreemiumsubscriptionfreepaidfreefreefreemiumfreemiumfreefree
MomentumZombieZombie-IntenseMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceSteadyMaintenance-
Update Cadence2 versions, ~863d avg2 versions, ~942d avg-5 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo2 versions, ~287d avg2 versions, ~2d avg5 versions2 versions, ~18d avg-

Compare EyeQue PDCheck head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by EyeQue PDCheck, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0