MARLVEL

Fastie: Calorie & Food Tracker vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Fastie: Calorie & Food Tracker's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Fastie: Calorie & Food Tracker
This App
Healthify: AI Calorie Tracker
Nemesis
AI Calorie Counter - Tracker
Contender
Calorie Counter & Food Tracker
Contender
Calorie AI - Protein Tracker
Contender
Calz: Calorie Counter AI
Contender
Quit Smoking - Quittr
Peer
NutriChef Member
Peer
Pawfit
Peer
Calorie Calculator & Food Log
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperDEEP FLOW SOFTWARE SERVICESHealthifyMe Private LimitedApps LabsMunicorn LimitedZipoAppsWachangaRamkumar VellaisamyTinyChefLatsen Technology Ltd.Riafy Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
CategoryHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & FitnessHealth & Fitness
PlatformAndroid, iOSiOS, AndroidiOSAndroid, iOSiOSAndroid, iOSiOSiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, Android
Store Metrics
Rating4.7 / 54.6 / 54.4 / 54.7 / 54.4 / 54.7 / 54.6 / 50.0 / 54.1 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count9265,9702321,2761162,979140372
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJul 25, 2024Dec 17, 2014Oct 6, 2024Jan 31, 2024Nov 18, 2024Dec 31, 2024May 30, 2024Jun 23, 2024Jun 17, 2018Oct 27, 2022
Last UpdatedMar 13, 2025Apr 9, 2026Jul 4, 2025May 18, 2026May 12, 2026Apr 16, 2026Feb 14, 2026Mar 5, 2026Apr 20, 2026Jul 16, 2025
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentimentmixednegative-terrible-mixed--mixed-
Score45/10020/100-25/100-45/100--60/100-
Praises
  • Food scanning functionality provides significant utility for tracking daily nutritional intake and progress
  • Extensive food database covering diverse Indian and international cuisines supports accurate tracking
-
  • Accurate food database entries allow for quick and effortless daily calorie logging
-
  • Automatic calorie calculation from food photography provides significant time savings for daily tracking
----
Complaints
  • Inaccurate AI food recognition and lack of manual editing tools frustrate users seeking precision
  • Aggressive paywalling of basic features like macro tracking and calorie goals frustrates long-term users
-
  • Deceptive subscription practices and hidden charges create significant financial frustration for new users
-
  • Inaccurate food recognition and calorie estimation force users to manually correct data frequently
----
Requests
  • Manual override functionality for food logs and nutrition data to ensure logging accuracy
  • Bidirectional data synchronization with Apple Health and Health Connect for comprehensive tracking
-
  • Comprehensive health data syncing including nutrition and fiber metrics for better tracking
-
  • Integration with health platforms to sync nutrition data across other fitness applications
----
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Fasting-first habit loop drives daily active usage
  • Barcode scanner reduces friction for new users
  • Infinite food database covering global cuisines sustains high initial adoption
  • AI-driven Snap technology reduces logging friction compared to manual-entry competitors
  • Human-coaching tier provides a high-margin revenue anchor
-
  • AI-first food recognition lowers the barrier to entry for casual users
  • Cunningham-based BMR calculations provide scientific credibility for personalized meal plans
  • Automated photo-based macro analysis reduces user friction
  • Lean interface avoids legacy feature bloat
  • AI-based photo logging reduces manual friction for casual users
  • Gamified streaks and badges drive session frequency
--
  • Wear OS integration provides a hardware-mapped trigger that increases daily active habit frequency
-
Weaknesses
  • Lack of manual data correction creates precision churn
  • Aggressive subscription prompts drive negative sentiment
  • Aggressive paywalling of previously free features drives high churn
  • Poor support responsiveness regarding subscription cancellations
  • Technical instability post-update
-
  • Lack of in-app cancellation forces reliance on unresponsive email support
  • Premium tier pricing lacks transparency before payment
  • Incomplete health data syncing limits utility for power users
  • 116 total ratings indicate low market penetration
  • Lacks proprietary food database for regional accuracy
  • No conversational coaching features
  • Premium tier at $29.99/year above category median
  • Technical instability causes data loss during scanning
  • AI misidentification forces frequent manual entry
--
  • Premium tier pricing lacks clear value differentiation from the ad-supported free experience
-
Pricingfreemiumfreemiumfreefreemiumfreemiumfreemiumfreefreefreemiumfree
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenance-ActiveZombieIntense--Maintenance-
Update Cadence2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~232d avg2 versions, ~34d avg-5 versions, ~19d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo5 versions--2 versions, ~18d avg-

Compare Fastie: Calorie & Food Tracker head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Fastie: Calorie & Food Tracker, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0