Feelings - Mood Journal vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Feelings - Mood Journal's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Doing Doing
Contender
4rabet
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperJiani LiBloom Built IncChaehui SeoGaeun Lee晓松 高Shanghai Ningguang Information Technology Co., Ltd.CHANHO LEEHangzhou Jina Information Technology Co., Ltd.Jake BieleDev2A
CategoryLifestyleHealth & FitnessLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleLifestyleSportsLifestyle
PlatformiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSiOSAndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating4.8 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 54.7 / 54.0 / 55.0 / 54.3 / 54.8 / 53.2 / 54.6 / 5
Ratings Count12116,168972742651016
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateAug 18, 2019Feb 4, 2016Sep 26, 2020Aug 24, 2022Mar 1, 2023Aug 27, 2020Aug 16, 2023Feb 3, 2025Feb 23, 2026Sep 26, 2025
Last UpdatedDec 16, 2024Apr 27, 2026Jun 20, 2026Dec 14, 2025Jun 3, 2025Apr 8, 2026Jun 7, 2026Jul 1, 2026Feb 24, 2026Mar 27, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-mixed--excellent-terrible--mixed
Score-45/100--90/100-10/100--50/100
Praises-
  • Long-term journaling habits supported by consistent daily check-in rituals and photo attachments
--
  • The diary application provides a satisfying experience through its story and random memory features
----
  • Friendly aesthetic and creative journal customization tools appeal to beginners in the writing space
Complaints-
  • Aggressive AI feature integration and subscription price hikes erode long-term user trust
--
  • Minor performance stuttering occurs during navigation likely due to the cross-platform development architecture
-
  • Aggressive advertisement frequency prevents users from accessing the core daily journaling and illustration features
  • Lack of creative drawing tools forces reliance on automated illustration features for daily entries
--
  • Aggressive paywalling of core features limits the experience for non-paying users post-update
  • Difficult object placement controls hinder the precision of journal layout design
Requests-
  • Voice-to-text and microphone integration to reduce friction during quick daily entry creation
-------
  • Image editing tools like cropping or erasing are needed for better journal composition
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • "Shake to glitch" visual effect creates a unique interaction loop
  • Ad-free, minimalist utility model lowers user friction
  • iCloud integration ensures data portability across Apple devices
  • End-to-end encryption establishes high switching costs for privacy-conscious users
  • Physical book printing creates a tangible archival moat for long-term records
  • Multi-platform sync ensures persistent data accessibility across the Apple ecosystem
  • Bullet journal task states provide a familiar, low-friction workflow for productivity-focused users.
  • Image export sharing functions as a visual referral mechanism for social growth.
-
  • Story-themed timeline structure enables narrative-first reflection
  • WebDAV sync provides data portability for power users
  • 36 emotional emojis allow for granular mood expression
  • Minimalist UI reduces cognitive load for daily reflection
  • Paper book export provides a tangible, high-value end-product
  • Curated content library drives daily habit formation
  • Generative AI visual output provides a personalized creative record
  • Zero-pressure, social-free environment reduces cognitive load for daily logging.
-
  • Creative canvas tools enable artistic expression
  • Massive sticker and image library drives engagement
Weaknesses
  • Zero revenue model limits long-term maintenance capacity
  • No structured journaling templates increase blank-page intimidation
  • Low review volume (12) limits social proof
  • Annual subscription price hikes drive churn among decade-long legacy users
  • Post-update stability issues cause data access anxiety and negative sentiment
  • AI-focused UI changes clutter the core writing experience for power users
  • Manual-entry requirement creates high friction compared to automated logging competitors.
  • Lack of cross-platform synchronization limits utility for power users.
-
  • Performance stutters during navigation erode the daily habit
  • Lack of biometric security protocols for private data
  • Non-native architecture limits UI fluidity
  • Lack of cross-platform synchronization limits user retention
  • Subscription gating for basic export features restricts the funnel
  • No automated entry options compared to AI-driven rivals
  • Aggressive ad frequency blocks core utility
  • Lack of manual drawing tools limits creative expression
  • Absence of historical mood analytics limits long-term user value.
-
  • Aggressive paywalling limits free-tier utility
  • Difficult object placement controls hinder layout precision
Pricingfreefreemiumfreefreesubscriptionsubscriptionfreefreefreefreemium
MomentumZombieActiveMaintenanceSteadyZombieMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenance-Maintenance
Update Cadence1 versions3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~16d avg1 versions, 1 majors/6mo5 versions1 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo1 versions1 versions, 1 majors/6mo-1 versions, 1 majors/6mo

Compare Feelings - Mood Journal head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Feelings - Mood Journal, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0