Report updated Jun 27, 2026
Fight List #Live
For casual trivia players and social gamers looking for competitive word-based challenges.
Fight List #Live is a challenged games app that is free with in-app purchases. With a 2.0/5 rating from 12 reviews, it faces significant user friction. Users particularly appreciate the core game concept provides an engaging experience for players who enjoy trivia challenges, though automated opponents using identical profile pictures and predictable behavior break the illusion of live play remains a common concern.
What is Fight List #Live?
Fight List #Live is a trivia competition game for iOS that features real-time matches, global leaderboards, and in-game power-ups.
Users hire this app for quick, competitive word-based trivia challenges, but the experience fails when the promised live multiplayer feels automated.
Current Momentum
v1.11 · 32mo ago
Zombie- Expanded Spanish and German language support
- Added new trivia themes
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
What Are The Key Features?
Real-time trivia competition against online opponents
In-game power-ups that provide hints or answers during matches
Leaderboard system tracking player performance and statistics
How much does it cost?
- Free to play
- In-app purchases for power-ups
Monetization relies on a free-to-play model with consumable in-app purchases for gameplay advantages.
Who Built It?
Two4Tea
Providing casual gamers with social trivia and arcade challenges designed for quick, competitive play.
Portfolio
13
Apps
What other apps does Two4Tea make?
Explore the full Two4Tea report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by Two4Tea.
What do users think recently?
Low confidence · 3 reviews analyzed
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a frustrated sentiment. Users appreciate the core game concept provides an engaging experience for players who enjoy trivia challenges, but report automated opponents using identical profile pictures and predictable behavior break the illusion of live play and inaccurate trivia categorization and flawed answer validation undermine the integrity of the competitive experience.
Limited review volume (3 reviews). Sentiment analysis will deepen as more data lands.
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for Fight List #Live?
How's The Games Market?
How does it evolve in the Games market?
The app holds the #100 Free position in its category, but a 2.0-star rating across 12 ratings indicates significant friction. The gap between the #100 rank and the original Fight List title's dominance signals a failure to capture the core audience.
Rank progression
1 active ranking tracked — 30-day window
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
This is the original, high-scale version of the target app's core concept, maintaining a massive user base and consistent update cadence.
Differentiators
- Leverages Voodoo's massive hyper-casual distribution network to maintain high daily active user counts
- Established brand-as-category status makes it the default search result for the Fight List concept
- High-frequency update cycle ensures the game remains compatible with latest OS versions and hardware
Head to head
The target app must pivot toward a unique social or real-time feature set to differentiate from the dominant original, as it cannot compete on raw content volume or player density.
Contenders(3)
A high-velocity competitor with an aggressive release schedule that keeps the game fresh for casual users.
Differentiators
- Frequent content updates every few days keep the puzzle pool feeling fresh and relevant
- Simplified grid-based mechanics offer a lower barrier to entry than traditional trivia-based games
The industry standard for trivia-based social competition, capturing the same audience intent as Fight List.
Differentiators
- Robust social features including friend challenges and global leaderboards drive long-term retention
- Multi-modal question formats including image and audio-based trivia provide a more dynamic experience
A dominant force in the word-puzzle category that competes for the same casual-gaming time budget.
Differentiators
- Integrates narrative-driven progression that turns standard word puzzles into a cohesive story-based experience
- High-production value visuals and thematic worlds create a premium feel that casual quiz games lack
Same space(3)
Directly competes for the trivia-focused segment of the target app's potential user base.
Differentiators
- Aggressive monetization strategy integrated into the core loop provides a blueprint for revenue scaling
- Extensive category-specific trivia packs allow for deep-dive play sessions
A classic puzzle game that occupies the same 'quick-play' mental space as the target app.
Differentiators
- Minimalist design philosophy allows for extremely fast session times compared to multi-round trivia
- Iconic visual-association mechanic has become a staple of the casual puzzle category
Competes in the 'brain teaser' sub-genre, appealing to the same audience looking for quick mental challenges.
Differentiators
- Focuses on lateral thinking and trick questions rather than pure knowledge-based trivia
- Highly visual puzzle design caters to users who prefer interactive logic over text-based answers
New entrants(1)
A recent entry from a major developer that signals a shift toward high-polish, bite-sized word games.
Differentiators
- Combines word-search mechanics with blast-style physics to create a more tactile puzzle experience
- Leverages modern UI design patterns to reduce cognitive load during rapid-fire gameplay
Compare Fight List #Live against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for Fight List #Live
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Global and friend rankings incentivize repeat play through social competition loops
Critical Frictions
- 2.0-star rating on iOS signals severe dissatisfaction with core gameplay authenticity
- Premium power-ups lack value when trivia validation is perceived as inaccurate
Growth Levers
- Diversifying opponent behavior patterns could restore the illusion of live play and improve retention
Market Threats
- Voodoo's dominant market position as the original Fight List developer creates a high barrier to user acquisition
What are the next best moves?
Audit opponent matchmaking logic because user complaints cite bot-like behavior → improve trust and retention
Top complaint theme identifies automated opponents as the primary reason for negative sentiment.
Trade-off: Pause new trivia theme development — bot-transparency is a higher-impact retention lever.
Fix trivia answer validation logic because users report incorrect classification of entities → reduce frustration
Inaccurate validation is the #2 complaint theme undermining competitive integrity.
Trade-off: Deprioritize social chat updates — gameplay integrity is the core product requirement.
A counter-intuitive read
The app's #100 chart position is actually a liability, as it signals the game is failing to convert the existing Fight List brand awareness into active users.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Multi-modal question formats (available in Trivia Crack but absent here)
- Narrative-driven progression (available in CodyCross but absent here)
Key Takeaways
The app fails to deliver on its #Live promise, because automated opponents destroy the competitive experience, so the PM must prioritize matchmaking transparency to prevent further churn.
Where Is It Heading?
Declining
The casual trivia market is consolidating around high-polish, authentic multiplayer experiences, leaving this app exposed. Without a pivot to genuine matchmaking or improved trivia accuracy, the current negative sentiment trend will continue to suppress new-user conversion.
High-frequency complaints regarding bot-like opponent behavior → erodes the live-play value proposition → accelerates churn among social gamers.
Inaccurate answer validation in the latest version → undermines competitive integrity → reduces willingness to purchase power-ups.