Report updated May 7, 2026
Five Nights at Freddy's 2
For fans of the horror-strategy genre and the Five Nights at Freddy's franchise who prefer mobile-optimized versions of established PC titles.
Five Nights at Freddy's 2 is a market-leading games app that is a paid app. With a 4.6/5 rating from 132.4K reviews, it delivers strong user satisfaction. Users particularly appreciate challenging gameplay mechanics provide high replay value for fans of the horror genre, though inconsistent mask mechanic responsiveness leads to unfair jumpscares during high-intensity night sessions remains a common concern.
What is Five Nights at Freddy's 2?
Five Nights at Freddy's 2 is a paid horror-strategy game for mobile, featuring security-camera monitoring and survival mechanics.
Players hire the game for high-tension, nostalgic horror experiences that reward pattern recognition and resource management under pressure.
Current Momentum
v2.0 · 8mo ago
Zombie- Removed input delay for mask activation
- Updated Google Play Billing library
- Updated target Android API level
What makes this app unique?
What Does It Look Like?
What Are The Key Features?
Security guard interface for tracking animatronic movement via office cameras
Wearable disguise to evade animatronic detection when characters enter the office
Localized text support for French, German, Dutch, Spanish, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Japanese, Chinese, and Korean
How much does it cost?
- $2.99 one-time purchase
Fixed-price model captures value upfront, but creates a barrier for casual users compared to free-to-play horror alternatives.
Who Built It?
CLICKTEAM LLC USA
Empowering indie developers with creation tools while publishing high-fidelity mobile ports of iconic survival horror and arcade titles.
Portfolio
13
Apps
What other apps does CLICKTEAM LLC USA make?
FNaF 6: Pizzeria Simulator
Five Nights at Freddy's 3
One Night at Flumpty's 2
Five Nights at Freddy's 4
Arcane Golf
Five Nights at Freddy's
Explore the full CLICKTEAM LLC USA report
Portfolio breakdown, audience, momentum, and every app published by CLICKTEAM LLC USA.
What do users think recently?
High confidence · Latest 100 of 153 total reviews analyzed · Based on 153 reviews. Signal may be noisy.
How did the latest release land?
What is the recent mood?
Recent user voice shows a thrilled sentiment. Users appreciate challenging gameplay mechanics provide high replay value for fans of the horror genre and faithful mobile port maintains the atmosphere and tension of the original pc experience, but report inconsistent mask mechanic responsiveness leads to unfair jumpscares during high-intensity night sessions.
What Users Love
What Frustrates Users
What Users Want
View the full user-sentiment analysis
Mood gauge, ratings & review-volume history, every praise / complaint / request, and sentiment over time.
What is the competitive landscape for Five Nights at Freddy's 2?
How's The Games Market?
How does it evolve in the Games market?
The title holds #51 Paid Overall in the US, but the #13 Paid category rank against a $2.99 price point suggests the conversion funnel is narrowing as free-to-play stealth-horror rivals gain traction.
Rank progression
379 active rankings tracked — 30-day window
The rivals identified
Nemeses(1)
This title mirrors the core 'survival horror against animatronics' loop and shares the same thematic niche of restricted-movement stealth gameplay.
Differentiators
- Features a more complex, multi-room facility layout compared to the target's static office-based security room.
- Integrates a tablet-based camera system that requires active battery management during intense survival sequences.
- Offers a more modern, high-fidelity 3D environment that contrasts with the target's retro-remastered aesthetic.
Head to head
The target app relies on brand legacy, while the nemesis competes by offering a more active, modern gameplay loop; the target should emphasize its unique atmospheric tension to retain its core audience.
Contenders(2)
A dominant force in the mobile horror space that captures the same 'creepy mascot' audience as the target.
Differentiators
- Focuses on surreal, physics-based horror interactions rather than the target's traditional jump-scare and resource management mechanics.
- Successfully expanded into a multi-chapter narrative experience that encourages long-term player retention.
High-velocity release cadence and strong thematic overlap in the 'stealth-horror' genre make this a significant threat.
Differentiators
- Utilizes a puzzle-heavy, exploration-focused gameplay loop that differentiates it from the target's stationary survival style.
- Maintains an aggressive content update schedule with 10 releases in the last six months to keep engagement high.
Same space(3)
A classic mobile horror experience that competes for the same 'jump-scare' focused player base.
Differentiators
- Focuses on a claustrophobic, dark-environment exploration loop that emphasizes tension over resource management.
- Uses a simplified, low-poly aesthetic that ensures performance on a wider range of legacy mobile devices.
Shares the 'stealth-horror' category and high-stakes cat-and-mouse gameplay, though with a more stylized, family-friendly aesthetic.
Differentiators
- Employs a vibrant, cartoon-inspired art style that appeals to a broader, younger demographic than the target.
- Incorporates platforming and environmental traversal mechanics that are absent from the target's stationary gameplay.
A foundational mobile horror title that shares the same 'hide-and-seek' audience despite a different setting.
Differentiators
- Defined the mobile 'escape-room' horror sub-genre with a minimalist, high-tension design that remains widely imitated.
- Maintains massive, long-term player loyalty through simple, accessible mechanics that require no complex tutorials.
Compare Five Nights at Freddy's 2 against every rival
All rivals in one side-by-side table — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel — plus a head-to-head page for each.
The outtake for Five Nights at Freddy's 2
Strengths to defend, gaps to attack
Core Strengths
- Established cult-classic brand identity drives organic discovery
- Faithful PC-to-mobile porting maintains high atmospheric tension
Critical Frictions
- $2.99 price point limits entry-funnel velocity
- Mask mechanic inconsistency triggers negative sentiment during high-intensity sessions
Growth Levers
- Adjustable difficulty settings could expand the casual player base
- B2B localization support enables deeper international market penetration
Market Threats
- Free-to-play stealth-horror rivals siphon casual users
- Scripted AI patterns lack the unpredictability of modern, free-roaming horror titles
What are the next best moves?
Tune mask mechanic responsiveness because users report unfair jumpscares → improve retention
Inconsistent mask responsiveness is the top complaint theme in user reviews.
Trade-off: Deprioritize new language support expansion to focus engineering on core mechanic stability.
Ship adjustable difficulty settings because casual players report excessive late-game frustration → increase conversion
Multiple reviews request easier modes to progress through story content.
Trade-off: Pause the development of additional cosmetic assets to prioritize gameplay accessibility.
A counter-intuitive read
The game's #51 Paid rank is not a failure but a defensive success, as the fixed-price model protects it from the ad-revenue volatility that plagues free-to-play horror rivals.
Feature Gaps vs Competitors
- Free-roaming environment (available in CASE: Animatronics)
- Active battery management (available in CASE: Animatronics)
Key Takeaways
The game maintains a strong core through its faithful PC port, but the $2.99 price point and difficulty spikes create a retention ceiling, so the PM should prioritize mechanic tuning to reduce churn among casual players.
Where Is It Heading?
Stable
The mobile horror market is shifting toward dynamic, free-roaming stealth experiences that offer more agency than the target's stationary office-based survival. Without an update to the core difficulty curve or mechanic responsiveness, the title risks losing its casual player base to free-to-play rivals.
Inconsistent mask mechanic responsiveness creates unfair death frustration, which erodes the long-term engagement of casual players.
Faithful porting of the original PC experience maintains high sentiment among the core horror fanbase.