MARLVEL

GeoPard Agriculture vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against GeoPard Agriculture's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

GeoPard Agriculture
This App
PoultryBaba: Poultry Rates PK
Nemesis
Taranis mobile
Contender
CropX – Farm Management
Contender
Ceres Imaging
Contender
FieldNET
Contender
Cropwise Imagery
Peer
Fertilizer Calc App
Peer
Drought Feed Calculator
Peer
BASF Agro Adviser
Peer
Core Identity
DeveloperFlyPardPoultry BabaTaranisCropX Technologies LTDCeres Imaging, IncLindsay Irrigation Solutions LLCSyngenta Digital LTDAAlberto GiamboneNSW Department of Primary IndustriesAgro BASF
CategoryBusinessBusinessBusinessUtilitiesBusinessBusinessUtilitiesUtilitiesBusinessUtilities
PlatformiOS, AndroidAndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS
Store Metrics
Rating5.0 / 54.1 / 55.0 / 54.8 / 54.6 / 53.0 / 55.0 / 51.0 / 55.0 / 55.0 / 5
Ratings Count16712613492111
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateJun 8, 2021Jan 13, 2021Jan 29, 2021May 4, 2016Feb 14, 2017Feb 23, 2018May 6, 2021Jan 27, 2019Oct 12, 2014Apr 24, 2018
Last UpdatedApr 15, 2026May 18, 2026Apr 29, 2026May 12, 2026May 5, 2026May 1, 2026Apr 16, 2026Jul 18, 2025Jan 18, 2018Aug 8, 2024
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment---mixedpositive-excellent---
Score---55/10085/100-90/100---
Praises---
  • Simple and straightforward usability makes the application accessible for agricultural monitoring tasks
--
  • The application provides a highly satisfying experience for agricultural management and simulation enthusiasts
---
Complaints---
  • Technical instability and location tracking failures disrupt field monitoring on older hardware
------
Requests---
  • Integrated field mapping and sensor data visualization to improve crop management precision
------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Cloud-based architecture supports complex business intelligence beyond simple price tracking
  • MyJohnDeere integration creates a B2B distribution barrier into commercial farm operations
  • Automated multi-year field potential zones provide high-fidelity data that manual calculators cannot match
-
  • AI-powered threat identification functions as a technical moat against manual scouting.
  • Geospatial mapping integration centralizes field-level decision support.
  • Proprietary sensor-to-dashboard integration creates high switching costs
  • Predictive agronomic models provide a technical moat against generalist farm apps
  • High-resolution multispectral imagery reduces input costs [Market Segment]
  • Offline mode ensures field-level utility [Platform]
  • Map-centric interface provides direct control over Lindsay irrigation hardware.
  • Sentinel-2 imagery integration enables seasonal crop trend tracking.
  • Syngenta ecosystem integration provides enterprise-grade support for large-scale operations
  • Quick-action notifications reduce friction in alert management
  • Flexible unit-conversion system supports diverse international farming standards
  • Elemental nutrient focus differentiates from generic chemical mixers
  • Government-backed authority establishes immediate trust with producers
  • Specialized drought-specific logic provides high-utility decision support
  • Hyper-localized Baltic climate database provides a regional barrier to entry
  • Free utility model reduces friction for farmer adoption
Weaknesses
  • Zero user reviews on Android and single-review status on iOS suggest low community engagement
  • Lack of real-time market data forces users to switch apps for daily financial checks
  • No integrated commodity price forecasting to optimize selling windows
-
  • Lack of market-trend data forces users to switch apps for financial decision-making.
  • No remote equipment control limits the app to monitoring rather than active management.
  • Technical instability and GPS failures on older hardware erode user trust
  • Lack of integrated commodity market data forces users to switch apps
  • Consultation-based pricing creates high adoption barriers [Pricing Strategy]
  • No direct machine-to-field integration [Feature Gap]
  • Lack of high-frequency market data creates a daily-habit deficit.
  • Android-iOS rating gap suggests inconsistent performance across platforms.
  • 0.0 rating on Android platform
  • No offline-first architecture for remote field usage
  • Lacks prescriptive agronomic intelligence
  • 1-star rating on iOS indicates critical usability regressions
  • Manual data entry requirements create high friction for professional users
  • No offline mode limits utility in remote field environments
  • No updates since 2018
  • Lack of offline mode limits utility in remote areas
  • Zero integration with farm machinery or procurement platforms
  • Manual advisory lookup is slower than AI-automated field health monitoring
Pricingfreefreefreefreemiumfreemiumfreefreefreemiumfreefree
MomentumMaintenance-MaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceZombieMaintenance
Update Cadence2 versions, ~0d avg-2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~14d avg1 versions2 versions, ~0d avg2 versions, 2 majors/6mo, ~0d avg2 versions, ~202d avg2 versions, ~1191d avg5 versions, ~93d avg

Compare GeoPard Agriculture head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by GeoPard Agriculture, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

See methodologyContact support

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0