High confidence · Latest 60 of 116 total reviews analyzed · Based on 116 reviews. Signal may be noisy.

Upset

Recent user voice shows a upset sentiment. Users appreciate the application provides a functional interface for professionals to connect with potential clients seeking services, but report professionals report paying for low-quality or non-existent leads that fail to convert into actual work and customer support and refund processes are perceived as unresponsive or unhelpful when disputes arise.

Rating: 2.9

Reviews: 116

Confidence: high

How did the latest release land?

Overall
2.9/ 5
(4.5K)
Current version
3.0/ 5
+0.1 vs overall
(3)
Main signal post-update: the application provides a functional interface for professionals to connect with potential clients seeking services.

Sentiment over time

Weekly average rating and review volume across stores, last 90 days.

Not enough recent reviews to plot a sentiment trend.

Review themes

Praise

What users love

  • The application provides a functional interface for professionals to connect with potential clients seeking services
    • Users appreciate the ease of accessing client contact information
    • Some professionals report successful business growth and lead generation
Complaint

Common complaints

  • Professionals report paying for low-quality or non-existent leads that fail to convert into actual work
    • Users frequently cite paying for contact information where the client does not respond or the project is fake
    • Professionals express frustration over high costs per lead without guaranteed service outcomes
  • Customer support and refund processes are perceived as unresponsive or unhelpful when disputes arise
    • Users report difficulty reaching support staff to resolve billing issues or fraudulent lead claims
    • Professionals feel ignored when requesting refunds for invalid or duplicate contact requests
  • The platform interface suffers from technical regressions and navigation issues that hinder daily professional usage
    • Users report persistent notification badges that do not clear after viewing new requests
    • Professionals note difficulty in sending messages or refreshing the request feed within the mobile app
Request

Most requested

  • Professionals request a fixed-fee model instead of paying per individual lead to reduce financial risk
    • Users suggest a flat subscription fee would be more equitable than the current per-contact payment structure

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Habitissimo para profesionales, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0