Hiring vs its rivals

Side-by-side comparison against Hiring's closest competitors — identity, store metrics, ratings & sentiment, and strategic intel.

Hiring
This App
Teamtailor
Contender
Core Identity
DeveloperSmartRecruiters, IncGreenhouse Software IncTravel Nurse Across America, LLCTeamtailorShanghai Dewu Information Group Co., Ltd.ZipoAppsCoople Global Services AGHouse of HRZoomInfoMohit Chandra
CategoryProductivityBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessBusinessEducation
PlatformiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOSiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS, AndroidiOS
Store Metrics
Rating3.3 / 52.1 / 53.2 / 52.4 / 55.0 / 54.2 / 51.8 / 54.0 / 54.6 / 50.0 / 5
Ratings Count1157127112549690
PriceFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFreeFree
Release DateFeb 5, 2014May 20, 2016May 4, 2022Sep 20, 2018Aug 25, 2025Dec 4, 2023Mar 30, 2017Feb 7, 2023Jan 5, 2020Feb 11, 2026
Last UpdatedMay 18, 2026Jan 13, 2026May 11, 2026May 5, 2026Apr 30, 2026May 10, 2026May 4, 2026May 13, 2026May 4, 2026Feb 26, 2026
Sentiment & Reviews
Sentiment-terriblemixedterrible----mixed-
Score-15/10050/10020/100----65/100-
Praises-
  • Daily usage for interview preparation and candidate feedback remains the core functional anchor for users
  • Convenient access to benefits and support team contacts
  • Core hiring and candidate tracking functionality provides value for recruiters when the application remains stable
----
  • Access to direct decision-maker contact information
-
Complaints-
  • Lack of core administrative actions forces users to switch to desktop browsers for basic tasks
  • Technical friction in profile and credential management
  • Frequent application crashes and infinite loading loops prevent users from accessing candidate data or jobs
  • Incomplete mobile feature set forces users to rely on browser versions for basic hiring tasks
----
  • Android stability and UI regressions
-
Requests-
  • Full parity with desktop features including candidate status updates and social media referral sharing
-
  • Native document viewing capabilities for candidate files to avoid external browser and file app dependency
------
Strategic Intel
Strengths
  • Real-time approval workflows reduce administrative hiring friction
  • Task assignment integration coordinates distributed hiring teams
  • Structured hiring methodology embeds into enterprise workflows to reduce churn
  • AI-assisted candidate summaries differentiate from legacy applicant tracking systems
  • Triple-layer fraud detection increases switching costs for enterprise clients
  • Centralized credential repository reduces administrative burden
  • Dedicated support team portal provides human-touch differentiation
  • Branded career-site builder creates high switching costs
  • 500+ integrations embed platform into enterprise workflows
  • Direct integration with the Dewu e-commerce ecosystem provides immediate access to a massive existing buyer base.
  • Guided step-by-step flow reduces user friction during initial resume setup
  • 800,000-worker pool provides immediate fulfillment capacity
  • QR-based attendance scanning protects margins
  • Centralized legal-compliance automation reduces B2B churn
  • Unified freelance-temp interface increases user lifetime value
  • Proprietary B2B contact database functions as a primary distribution barrier.
  • Buyer intent signals provide high-value lead intelligence that justifies enterprise-tier pricing.
  • AI-driven interview adaptation creates a differentiated candidate screening experience
  • Modern interface reduces friction for independent professionals
Weaknesses
  • Requires existing enterprise account to access any functionality
  • Lacks AI-powered candidate screening tools found in competitors
  • 2.1-star rating indicates severe mobile usability friction
  • Lack of candidate status updates forces desktop-only workflow
  • Persistent login failures prevent reliable access to scorecards
  • 2.7★ Android rating indicates significant technical debt
  • Manual document-tracking workflows create user friction
  • 2.4★ iOS rating indicates severe stability issues
  • Lack of native PDF viewing forces browser dependency
  • Static seller profile management lacks the automated content-generation tools found in competitive productivity apps.
  • Lack of biometric authentication creates a security perception gap for sensitive career data
  • 1.8-star rating on iOS indicates severe UX friction
  • Zero Android rating data limits platform visibility
  • Manual discovery flow limits speed-to-hire
  • Lack of AI-driven matching reduces fulfillment reliability
  • 1.64-star Android-iOS rating gap indicates a failure to maintain mobile parity.
  • Reliance on enterprise-grade subscriptions limits the user base to high-budget organizations.
  • Lack of integrated payroll and time-tracking tools limits utility for contract workers
  • No established user base or rating history
Pricingsubscriptionsubscriptionfreesubscriptionfreesubscriptionfreefreefreemiumfreemium
MomentumMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceMaintenanceActiveMaintenanceMaintenance
Update Cadence1 versions, 1 majors/6mo2 versions, ~14d avg2 versions, ~3d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~68d avg1 versions2 versions, ~56d avg2 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~4d avg3 versions, 1 majors/6mo, ~7d avg2 versions, ~0d avg1 versions

Compare Hiring head-to-head

Disclosure: Independent intel to help mobile builders succeed.

AI-powered analysis with editorial review, built from publicly available sources. Marlvel.ai is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Hiring, its developer, the app publisher, Apple, or Google Play. All trademarks, logos, and screenshots referenced remain the property of their respective owners.

Data licensed under CC-BY-NC 4.0